Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine

It is really extra-Contstitutional as to whether he wants to call his horse this or that. The Constitution is meant to put limits on government, not people........


41 posted on 08/07/2007 3:51:42 PM PDT by Red Badger (All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
Red Badger
"-- He can call his horse anything he wants, --"

So you agree he has a "blanket protection" for free speech in his private name for his horse?

It is really extra-Contstitutional as to whether he wants to call his horse this or that.

You just agreed that to race at a public track, the jockey club could [constitutionally speaking] limit what he 'calls' his horse. - You can't have it both ways.

The Constitution is meant to put limits on government, not people........

All people living in the USA are 'limited' by our supreme "Law of the Land".

As servicemen, we swore an oath to support & defend. ALL of us are so obligated, as per our oath of Citizenship. -- So -- We the People can't run about calling publicly raced horses by names that may be offensive to religious, political or ethnic groups. - Those are 'fighting words' under common law.

45 posted on 08/07/2007 4:39:07 PM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson