Lord knows muzzies have never, ever engaged in hijacking....
The boxcutters they used (not “knives”,
If it's got a blade, it's a knife. (Geez do I really need to point that out?)
To have negligence, one must fail to act when a reasonable reason exists to act.
Let's see; multiple muslim males attempt to enter commercial aircraft carrying weapons.
Nope, no reason to get worked up there!
L
1. At the time, no one thought that Muslim males would hijack a plane AND use it as a missle.
2. The boxcutters they used (not "knives" although yes they were used in that fashion) weren’t obvious weapons at the time
I rest with my original claim: To have negligence, one must fail to act when a reasonable reason exists to act.
Prove to me that before 9/11, it was reasonable to expect hijackers would crash a plane into a building.
Prove to me that before 9/11, boxcutters were considered weapons on a plane.
If you can't, then you are doing just as I said in my original post: you are analyzing the situation with a post-9/11 mentality.