actually in this day and age of identitity theft he does have a legit case on the disclosure of his financial information.
This is a contracts case.
Duty, breach, causation, damages.
In this case the damages are probably statutory at a minimum.
The issue of adultery is just the sensationalism part.
The author is not so bright.
Duty, breach, causation, damages.
My torts professor would have jumped all over you for using the elements of tort to describe a contract case. He was a regular John Houseman clone.
Offer, acceptance, consideration, (and, optionally for some) remedy.
Are you sure you aren't channeling Prosser?