Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

In contract terms, there was a contract to supply flowers, which was fully performed. I suspect this “don’t send a receipt” business was either only a unilateral request, which was not accepted by the florist, or even if “agreed,” it was not part of the purchase contract but was a side deal unsupported by consideration, and thus was unenforceable.


46 posted on 08/09/2007 2:06:48 PM PDT by Burma Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Burma Jones

ohhhh so close.

You forget federal laws regarding dissemination of financial information.

also you are addressing this as if it is two contracts rather than the one.

Does the flower company have a policy of giving out financial purchase information to WHOEVER calls for it? Seems they are a bit TOO free with the financial information.

Even if they win this case, they will lose in the court of public opinion IF (said IF) the story gets legs.


50 posted on 08/09/2007 2:36:22 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson