Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2007 12:25:22 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sauropod

review


2 posted on 08/11/2007 12:26:39 AM PDT by sauropod (You can’t spell crap without the AP in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
If dissent is so rare, why do global-warming conformists feel the strong need to argue that minority views should be dismissed as nutty or venal?

Global warming isn't science, its a religion. Dissenters are heretics.
3 posted on 08/11/2007 12:49:58 AM PDT by kb2614 (Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

The man-made global warming position is unconvincing on scientific merit; so the proponents resort to the empty argumentum ad hominem. Rather than address the substance of the scientific facts; global warmers personally attack the critics of man-made global warming. Logical fallacy works in the public mind as the public is not educated in logic.


5 posted on 08/11/2007 2:28:12 AM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
After all the Newsweek-like stories announcing the debate is over, it took one debate to flip the audience. No wonder they want to muzzle dissent.

That says it all.

7 posted on 08/11/2007 3:19:27 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Paralyzing fog would be dangerous indeed.


8 posted on 08/11/2007 3:41:06 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

“Paralysis” is good in this situation. If we don’t change anything, the global climate will putter along in its usual, variable way, and we’ll all die, eventually, just as we would if we did Something Terribly Drastic about “climate change.”


9 posted on 08/11/2007 4:36:03 AM PDT by Tax-chick (All the main characters die, and then the Prince of Norway delivers the Epilogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

reminds me of hillary’s “vast global right wing conspiracy”.

whatta joke.


10 posted on 08/11/2007 4:39:44 AM PDT by ken21 (28 yrs + 2 families = banana republic junta. si.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
...has created a paralyzing fog of doubt around climate change...

If that is true, then they haven't done a very good job........

11 posted on 08/11/2007 5:29:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

14 posted on 08/11/2007 6:15:41 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

The night before last there was a FROST WARNING for North-Central Alberta (west of Fort MacMurray). This is early AUGUST. Edmonton was the same temperature (55*) as Yellowknife NWT at 8 that night.

It’s been a quite cool summer here (Vancouver Island) as well. Only 3 or 4 days of real heat, and that was in JUNE!

Global warming my fat patoot!


15 posted on 08/11/2007 7:40:57 AM PDT by Don W (Still searching for another pithy yet erudite tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
If you go to the article on Townhall there is a Reuters photo of the world renown climate scientist and all around expert on environmental issues, Rob Lowe, with the following caption: “Actor Rob Lowe waves as he drives off in a A123Systems plug-in hybrid after testifying before the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming on Capitol Hill in Washington July 12, 2007. Seated next to Lowe is Representative Ed Markey (D-MA).”

I swear! Regardless of which side I held on the issue of global warming, I would be insulted as a congressman or senator if I had to sit and listen to ANY airhead actor pontificate his views on the issue. What is it with Congress that they are so willing to give credence to testimony by people who have no professional expertise in the topic on which they are testifying, simply because they come from Hollywood?

16 posted on 08/11/2007 8:03:27 AM PDT by Nevadan (nevadan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Don’t they call it weather because no one knows weather it will rain or not ?


17 posted on 08/11/2007 8:09:22 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson