when you did finally give me a source, it turned out to be unnamed.
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
and you didn’t even bother to read my comment at post# 2 under the nonsensical article at the link, which (combined with the article above) is the source of my amusement and cynicism toward articles out of Pakistan expressed in post #2 on THIS thread. Nonetheless, if you had been reading news re Pakistan over the last few days (what did condi do? remember?), you wouldn’t have needed to demand sourcing from me.....trust me, they have been plentiful.
So this little exchange between you and I here is moot. I gave you the benefit of the doubt to a point, but you finally cleared it up for me. Oh, one last thing.....obviously you have no clue as to what Aricept is, which is why the joke in #2 above went right over your head.
Nonetheless, if you had been reading news re Pakistan over the last few days (what did condi do? remember?), you wouldn’t have needed to demand sourcing from me.....trust me, they have been plentiful.
Sources? Plentiful? LOL! The publication of the unnamed source is plentiful. I haven't seen any direct Rice quotes that show, she said what you said she said. The importance of having direct quotes apparently remains over your head.
Your charge about Rice remains unsupported.
BTW, I know what Aricept is. Your joke is stupid because it is based on false information.