My criticism was of the article, not of the theoretical case against this vaccine, which I don’t really know enough about to comment on.
IMHO, an argument is made more effective by including all relevant data and then explaining why your argument is accurate anyway, not by ignoring critical data.
Unless the critical data blows so big a hole in your argument that your best option is to resolutely ignore it.
I directed you to the CDC site. You should take the time to read through it carefully in regards to HPV.
I won’t bother going into this argument again as it has already been done several times on FR treads, which someone above has probably given links to.