That is what robots do. I take a look at the issues and decide what I think about them. I can agree with policy decision of individuals or groups without agreeing with the points that brought them to the conclusion.
I agreed with Hillary that we should go to war with Iraq. She came to the decision through political calculation, while I came to it through a security interest. I also agreed with many Democrats who voted against the Medicare Prescription bill. They didn't think it was socialist enough and I though it was too socialist.
Wrong. It's true that which org supports what isn't always an indicator of right and wrong (such as when the ACLU ends up on the right side of a case every once in awhile) but it usually is a good indicator of where things are going. It's even better than usual in this case. overs of death are supporters of this philosophy.
And as I said, anyone who sees humans as a liability or a zero-sum game is working against reality.