Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nitzy
taking away freebies, supplements and incentives sounds good to me.

Before social security, people had incentive to have and raise productive members of society: it was their retirement plan. These days parents get little back for raising their children to succeed. If the government paid a small commission to parents for taxes paid by their children, and took away a bit of social security if their children ended up a burden in jail, suddenly you'd see parents being more careful about who they have children with and how much effort they put into their upbringing.

18 posted on 08/13/2007 8:40:59 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses

I have been saying that for years. I could not agree more.


20 posted on 08/13/2007 8:45:53 PM PDT by nitzy (globalism and limited government cannot co-exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Reeses
If the government paid a small commission to parents for taxes paid by their children, and took away a bit of social security if their children ended up a burden in jail, suddenly you'd see parents being more careful about who they have children with and how much effort they put into their upbringing.

My what a good idea. Or is it?

Social engineering through taxation is a fundamental tenant of Maarxism. We are steeped in this approach.

A government that seeks to promote the general welfare through the distribution of wealth is a tyrant.

31 posted on 08/14/2007 8:03:54 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson