Where did I say that to support something one must find that everyone who supports it is a good person?
What I said was that the list of people who support zero or sub-zero population growth is a list of people who love death.
Keep on dancing around all you want, but the bottom line is that being zero-pop is being anti-human, and it means that at best one has a vision of human value that is totaly at odds with reality and support of life.
Alright you caught me. I'm anti-human. I also favor residential zoning regulations within 5 miles of my home and that makes me anti-business. I also supported our neighborhood building a new park which makes me a tree-hugging hippie. Due to constitutional issues I disagree with Federal drug laws which makes me a no good doper.
Where did I say that to support something one must find that everyone who supports it is a good person? What I said was that the list of people who support zero or sub-zero population growth is a list of people who love death
I don't know how to respond to that. You asked a question and then immediately answered it. (example.....When did I ever type a contraction? You just don't pay attention.) By criticizing the list of people who advocate an issue you are in fact saying that the issue is not valid in part because of who advocates it. The bottom line is that I don't think the government should enact policies making it easier for fools and naer-do-wells to procreate and raise foolish and naer-do-well children. I think it is ridiculous to think that more is always better regardless of what or who the 'more' is.