Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This makes three of Vick's co-defendants who've been flipped. What's worse for him, the Feds are putting on serious pressure by threatening to file a superseding indictment with "at least two more Federal dog fighting charges." His only hope now seems to be an OJ jury.
1 posted on 08/14/2007 5:04:38 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: libstripper

Local news is guessing he will force a jury trial.


2 posted on 08/14/2007 5:08:43 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
I was playing Trivial Pursuit the other day and one question asked "Which of OJ's lawyers stated he wanted nothing to do with OJ's trial because it was a sure loser?"

Answer: Johnny Cochran

I am positive Vick can get himself an OJ jury in Atlanta, but will he end up a complete wreck like OJ?

4 posted on 08/14/2007 5:12:53 AM PDT by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

If Vick looks up he should see the bus he was thrown under.


8 posted on 08/14/2007 5:26:06 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Vick must decide whether to accept plea agreement

Puts me in mind of this quote...

"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"

Do ya, Vick?

9 posted on 08/14/2007 5:28:01 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

“THE QUARTERBACK IS TOAST”


10 posted on 08/14/2007 5:29:12 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch (Rush Limbaugh, the Winston Churchill of our time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

“That comes on the heels of news that co-defendants Purnell Peace and Quanis Phillips are scheduled to appear in federal court in Richmond at the end of the week and are expected to accept their own plea agreements.”

Like rats deserting a sinking ship. With friends like that, Vick doesn’t need enemies. His “friends” are hanging him out to dry.


13 posted on 08/14/2007 5:32:38 AM PDT by fredhead (Teach a man to fish.......and he'll fish for a lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

“His only hope now seems to be an OJ jury.”

Unfortunately, in today’s world, guilt or innocence won’t matter much.


17 posted on 08/14/2007 5:38:57 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

With a sharp attorney Vick can go to a jury and win. All he needs is a sympathetic “OJ” jury. Their is probably enough in the backgrounds of the two government informants to make their testimony “suspect” or incredible.


18 posted on 08/14/2007 5:40:57 AM PDT by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Vick must decide whether to accept plea agreement

The feds are probably offering him a good deal. He would be wise to take it. They don't want the race-baiters to start screaming about the fact that Vick is black, and Vick doesn't want to spend any more time behind bars than necessary. If they offer him 1 year (the length he's out of the NFL anyway), he should leap at it with tears of joy in his eyes. He will probably not be able to overcome the mountain of evidence and witnesses against him at the moment... even with a Johnnie Cochran at his side. Vick would be financially ravaged AND facing many more years behind bars, all in the hopes for another OJ jury. It's not worth the risk. Take the deal, if it is anything under 2 years (and likely will be).

21 posted on 08/14/2007 5:46:24 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
You’ve got to ask yourself what in the world made Vick think he could get away with this endeavor. Is it possible that NFL stars are so convinced of their their own importance and invulnerability that no one would notice, or if they did would be powerless to act?

There’s no way in the world you can run an enterprise of this size, with this many people in the know, and hope to keep your involvement secret.

My guess is that, like a lot of big sports stars, he’s just so very arrogant that he completely discounted the possibility of being called to account for his activities. If that’s the case then I would hang him for that alone, never mind the terrible thing he was doing.

22 posted on 08/14/2007 5:46:49 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

‘This makes three of Vick’s co-defendants who’ve been flipped. What’s worse for him, the Feds are putting on serious pressure by threatening to file a superseding indictment with “at least two more Federal dog fighting charges.” His only hope now seems to be an OJ jury.’

He’ll never stand trial now. Its not just the three ‘co-defendents’ here. People are forgetting Vick’s ‘cousin’ that lived in the house, and obviously was part of the ‘day to day operation’ of the Kennel. He wasn’t indicted.

The only way that happens in a Federal investigation is if he copt a deal BEFORE, or immediately after, the story broke.

Smart money says Vick takes the plea bargain by ‘close of business’ Friday afternoon (4PM EST).

Watch and see. He’s going to prison.


27 posted on 08/14/2007 6:11:33 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

After the OJ fiasco, I think he should go for a trial. He only needs one juror.


28 posted on 08/14/2007 6:13:17 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

At the risk of putting myself in a position where I might be perceived as defending Vick, why is this a federal case?

Did something (dogs, people, money?) cross state lines? There are FEDERAL dog-fighting laws?? Or is it FEDERAL animal-cruelty laws?

I think there are too many FEDERAL laws.


32 posted on 08/14/2007 6:19:26 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Is this a felony charge?


34 posted on 08/14/2007 6:24:01 AM PDT by tioga (Thanks to SG for my homework idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Don’t rule that out.
I don’t think you can find a “jury of his peers” that will convict him regardless of the facts or evidence.


40 posted on 08/14/2007 6:43:41 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Tie a T-bone around his neck, rub his orange jumpsuit with the oozings of a bitch in season, then toss him to a bunch of hungry Amstaffs!


43 posted on 08/14/2007 6:51:40 AM PDT by meandog (Romney and Giuliani: Just like Bill Clinton, lying draft-dodgers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

One of my black friends said she overheard her two sons talking and one said, “Do you think Vick will go to the pen?” and the other said, “I don’t know. O.J. killed two people and he didn’t.”


48 posted on 08/14/2007 6:57:40 AM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper; All

Would someone here actually lay out the publicly-released evidence that directly (not merely by association) implicates Vick? It can’t be merely that he owned the house, or received rent paid by tenants who were doing something wrong, or went to a dog fight — I want to hear how he was actually running a criminal exercise.

Is the evidence out there?


52 posted on 08/14/2007 7:13:44 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

What happened to their no snitching rule?


53 posted on 08/14/2007 7:18:57 AM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Why are they even offering him a plea deal if they have so much evidence and witnesses? Are they having trouble tying him directly to the crimes?

Are they just offering him a plea deal because a lot of rich and powerful people want this to go away as soon as possible rather than going to trial?

59 posted on 08/14/2007 7:40:07 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson