Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lesko

The average Joe wouldn’t be Federally prosecuted for dog-fighthing. Where’s the publicity in that?


13 posted on 08/14/2007 11:39:37 AM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Smogger

The state of Virginia was sitting on its hands, not moving forward with the case that they should have prosecuted. This is why the Feds took over.


14 posted on 08/14/2007 11:50:09 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (“I will be to this generation a second Mohammed" Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
Actually, dog-fighting is a federal crime. Viz.,

In 1999, Title 18, Section 48 was added to the U.S. Code, making it a federal crime to “knowingly create, sell or possess a depiction of animal cruelty with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain.” The term “depiction of animal cruelty” means any visual or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-picture film, video recording, electronic image, or sound recording of conduct in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed—if such conduct is illegal under federal law or the law of the state in which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, regardless of whether the maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or killing took place in the state. ...

In 2007, Congress passed the Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act with strong bipartisan support. The Act became law in May 2007, and provides for felony penalties for interstate commerce, import and export relating to commerce in fighting dogs, fighting cocks and cock fighting paraphernalia.

(from the ASPCA)

Now, how often it gets prosecuted is a separate matter. I couldn't readily find national statistics. I expect we'll be hearing a lot more about this in the near future.

18 posted on 08/14/2007 12:04:11 PM PDT by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
The average Joe wouldn’t be Federally prosecuted for dog-fighthing. Where’s the publicity in that?

Please tell me you are not trying to excuse this jackass. I could care less who prosecutes this bum just so long as justice is served. Breeding dogs to kill each other for fun and profit is disgusting and reprehensible.

20 posted on 08/14/2007 12:33:06 PM PDT by mort56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Smogger
The average Joe wouldn’t be Federally prosecuted for dog-fighthing

This is about more than just dog fighting which in itself is a federal crime. It is about engaging in a criminal enterprise for the purpose of interstate gambling. If this was just a couple of country boys fighting their dogs in the woods, you'd be right

And FWIW - I never have bought the "he makes so much money he can't be bought by gamblers" reasoning. Any professional athlete who engages in big money wagering (either legally or illegally) could find himself in a situation where was forced to provide certain "services" to those to whom he owes money.

The NFL should ban him for life
24 posted on 08/14/2007 12:59:22 PM PDT by The Lumster (USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson