Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abbas Seeks Unity With Hamas, Breaking Promise to US Congressmen
Arutz Sheva ^ | 7-16-7 | Ezra HaLevi

Posted on 08/16/2007 5:54:34 AM PDT by SJackson

(IsraelNN.com) Just days after promising US lawmakers that his Fatah movement would not reconcile with Hamas, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas is inviting the Islamist movement to kiss and make up.

Abbas called on Hamas to “return to national unity” following his meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso Wednesday. "The split that happened as a result of Hamas's coup is temporary and will be removed," Abbas said. Hamas welcomed Abbas’s statements and invited him to negotiations in Gaza.

Hamas and Fatah briefly formed a unity government after hammering out a power-sharing deal in Mecca that they hoped would renew international aid to the Palestinian Authority. Western aid had been cut off since Hamas won PA elections in a landslide, though the PA as a while received more money than ever before with the help of Muslim donor countries.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office issued a warning Wednesday night that a Hamas-Fatah reconciliation would result in the breakdown of the nascent “diplomatic process” that is being hastily constructed by Abbas and Olmert.

Arabic-language papers repeatedly report that secret talks between Hamas and Fatah are ongoing.

More Fatah Good-Will Gestures to Hamas Fatah released nine Hamas terrorists in Bethlehem. The men had been arrested last months for organizing terror cells in Judea and Samaria.

Hamas hailed the move as another in a series of goodwill gestures, most notably the payment of a year’s salary to thousands of Hamas men in Gaza by Fatah using money transferred by Israel. The transfer took place just a day after Fatah Prime Minister Salam Fayyad promised Republican Congressmen that there would be no reconciliation with Hamas. Democratic Congressmen visiting Israel this week say they believe Fayyad’s claim that the transfer happened by accident, due to a “clerical error.”

Senior Palestinian Authority official Youssef Al-Zumour was arrested last week, however for allowing PA finances to be used in paying the salaries of 3,500 Hamas terrorists. Yediot Acharonot quoted PA sources admitting that Al-Zumour paid the salaries on purpose.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: israel

1 posted on 08/16/2007 5:54:36 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

2 posted on 08/16/2007 5:56:24 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Of course the Dems believed it. They never met a terrorist or dictator they didn’t like. Hey Nancy—time to crawl back into your burka and work some of that diplomatic voodoo of yours. It worked **SO** well last time.../sarc


3 posted on 08/16/2007 6:06:57 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

geez!

a snake acting like a snake...

who’d a thunk?


4 posted on 08/16/2007 6:09:59 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

So, how about all of those $$$$$$ that we gave Abbas to shore him up after Hamas kicked his rump in Gaza. Do we get that back now?


5 posted on 08/16/2007 6:12:19 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
AND the weapons?

Carolyn

6 posted on 08/16/2007 6:13:16 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Excuse my naivete - but “Breaking Promise to US Congressmen
“???

In matters of dealing with foreign potentates - don’t we have set protocol, like ambassadors and secretary of state, a president, etc for dealing directly with them?

Why are congresscritters/senators etc running abroad and sticking their noses in between the established channels, mucking up the waters?

(I mean, why, OTHER than for personal posturing and/or purposely mucking up things...)

7 posted on 08/16/2007 7:25:44 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Because Congress appropriates foreign aid, and there are many Congressmen opposed to providing aid to Hamas. In fact, if Fatah and Hamas kiss and make up before a substantial aid package is approved, I doubt GWB will be able to get the $ to them.


8 posted on 08/16/2007 7:33:54 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"The transfer took place just a day after Fatah Prime Minister Salam Fayyad promised Republican Congressmen that there would be no reconciliation with Hamas. Democratic Congressmen visiting Israel this week say they believe Fayyad’s claim that the transfer happened by accident, due to a “clerical error.”

The only thing our representatives seem to have learned from their latest error is how to rationalize it.

9 posted on 08/16/2007 7:35:09 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; norton
First Fayyad supposedly promises Republican congressmen that there would be no reconciliation with Hamas. Then Democratic congressmen believe the transfer to Hamas occurred as the result of a "clerical error."

If he makes a promise to Republicam congressmen, then perhaps breaks it, why should the Democrats be forgiving him?

Something seems amiss in the reporting.

10 posted on 08/16/2007 9:56:20 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
... if Fatah and Hamas kiss and make up before a substantial aid package is approved ... nobody in the world will give them any money.

With Hamas as "bad terrorists" and Fatah as "possibly not so bad terrorists" nobody will even look to pressure Israel to any concessions before "Palestinians" resolve their own problems trying to fight for the money and weapons - which could be a very long time and possibly, never.

Splitting "Palestinians" in two (or three) parties has been the best development in that area in the last couple of years... Even Arab countries are getting sick and tired of them as they are screwing up their various "peace plans" with Israel. It's a good thing!

11 posted on 08/16/2007 9:59:25 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
With Hamas as "bad terrorists" and Fatah as "possibly not so bad terrorists" nobody will even look to pressure Israel to any concessions before "Palestinians" resolve their own problems trying to fight for the money and weapons - which could be a very long time and possibly, never.

The Bush administration is doing just that, pressuring Israel into final status talks with a terrorist government in control of only 60% of their population. And sending them weapons and $ to promote Jewhatred in the media and their schools. The administration requires nothing of the palestinians, if they did they'd tell them, and the Saudis, that negotiations are impossible until a stable, tolerant, anti-terror administration is in place.

As to aid, if they have the sense to make up formally, allow Hamas back in the government, after the aid is flowing, the Euros will certainly continue. My guess Condi will be back to her Hamas members in government are businessmen, not terrorists, and if we end aid it will be due to Congress. GWB wants a state very, very badly.

12 posted on 08/16/2007 10:55:59 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
if they did they'd tell them, and the Saudis, that negotiations are impossible until a stable, tolerant, anti-terror administration is in place.

Actually they are doing exactly that, it just doesn't get a lot of press, and whatever little it does get certainly doesn't trickle down to FR. With Olmert in charge, if Bush and Condi really pressured Israel into talks and concessions it would be done already. Clinton had no problems doing just that and see actual implementation of "Land for more Intifada" process.

Condi's diplo-speak designed to "put Arabs to sleep" as they themselves characterize it, doesn't bother me in the least, that's what she is paid to do. Diplo-speak is cheap. Right now we have both Hamas and Fatah fighting with each other for spoils of "Palestinian Authority", so there is nobody to "talk to" and the rest of their neighbors can go on with their lives. I say, it's a win-win.

13 posted on 08/16/2007 11:17:23 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Knock me over with a feather.

A Muslim chose to lie to America and buddy up with a fellow Muslim? I'm stuned I tell you!

14 posted on 08/16/2007 11:18:40 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
Actually they are doing exactly that, it just doesn't get a lot of press, and whatever little it does get certainly doesn't trickle down to FR. With Olmert in charge, if Bush and Condi really pressured Israel into talks and concessions it would be done already. Clinton had no problems doing just that and see actual implementation of "Land for more Intifada" process.

It's filtered down just fine. The administration has been clear on it's positions, a sovereign palestinian state, no changes to the 1949 lines without Arab consent, an end to the occupation, cessation of a corridor connecting Gaza and the West Bank by Israel. There really isn't anything left to talk about other than the right of return.

Pressured into talks? Ohlmert and Abbas have been talking for weeks, both acknowledge that, and GWB is hosting a peace summit in November.

Of course the palestinian "government" is illegitimate given the loss of Gaza (GWB will negotiate with Abbas as head of the PLO), and Ohlmert's government is widely expected to fall, so it's a fools errand.

But why not invest our efforts here, the creation of a palestinian state is a cornerstone of American foreign policy according to GWB, and there are no pressing problems facing us in any other parts of the world.

15 posted on 08/16/2007 11:26:31 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
"...why should the Democrats be forgiving him?"

Beating the Pubbies to it, response would have been the same either-way.

16 posted on 08/16/2007 11:43:54 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Of course the palestinian "government" is illegitimate given the loss of Gaza

Of course!

GWB will negotiate with Abbas as head of the PLO

That's the point! "Negotiate" with "illegitimate" "government"... Hmm, that's like me "negotiating" with Mattel to provide me a flesh and blood Barbie or real F-22 Raptor.

Ohlmert's government is widely expected to fall, so it's a fools errand.

There you go! Quad erat demonstrandum! I love diplo-speak! In the meantime, we sign a $30B worth of military supply agreement (that's real, not a fool's errand) to go along with $20B sale to our "friends" Saudis (do we really want them to buy it from Russia and France?). And it makes us look politically good to Arabs and UN types as we "try" to bring "peace" to the "Palestinians"... (if only they stop fighting among themselves and renounce violence and stop demanding destruction of Israel - like that's going to happen!).

Fool's errand trying to "create" Palestinian state when "Palestinians" think it's a state of Israel - what can be better!

17 posted on 08/16/2007 11:59:18 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson