Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hill to link AMT, new tax
The Washington Times ^ | 8-17-07 | Patrice Hill

Posted on 08/17/2007 10:36:47 AM PDT by JZelle

A Democratic proposal to raise taxes on the private partnerships that are behind buyout mania on Wall Street has a good chance of passing because legislators plan to couple it with an extension of Alternative Minimum Tax relief — a combination President Bush would have a hard time vetoing.

The higher taxes would be imposed on private equity and hedge funds — and possibly real estate and other private partnerships — to generate as much as $80 billion in revenues that could pay for two years of relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax, or AMT, investment analysts estimate.

AMT relief under Republican-led Congresses was extended only one year at a time, raising the dilemma that a major new tax burden will be imposed next year on as many as 23 million taxpayers with incomes between $75,000 and $500,000. The tax applies to households that make heavy use of certain tax breaks such as tax-exempt bonds and child credits.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amt; congress; fleecing; govwatch; taxes
So they don't plan to ever fix it. Sooner or later we're all going to get hit by it.
1 posted on 08/17/2007 10:36:50 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The Dems will hike taxes on the rich first. The AMT "relief" is temporary. President Bush should veto the bill.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 08/17/2007 10:47:12 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I think there should be a new tax on rich Democrats who are always proposing new taxes.


3 posted on 08/17/2007 10:51:14 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Dems will hike taxes on the rich first.

No they will do what they always do: redefine Rich.
4 posted on 08/17/2007 10:51:28 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (If Roger Maris got an asterisk next to his name, Bonds should get a syringe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The best thing would be to somehow kill this in congress before it ever gets to Dubya -- This is a lose-lose for the president.

If he signs it - HE RAISED TAXES (at least that will be the mantra). if he vetoes it - he will still be charged with a De Facto tax increase on those then hit by the AMT.

5 posted on 08/17/2007 10:53:53 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Oh Great! So now we’re taxed for taking money out of our banks at the ATM?

.....never mind...


6 posted on 08/17/2007 10:55:39 AM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

But when they DO fix the AMT, at least they should call it what it is:

A tax cut for the rich!
LOL!

Who’s it going to benefit most? The East Coast DINKs.
(Dual Income No Kids)


7 posted on 08/17/2007 10:55:57 AM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Sounds like a stealth plan to tax private equity and hedge funs at the same time as the imposition of the AMT...


8 posted on 08/17/2007 10:57:09 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Hitlery Clintoon is a sickening reactionary who takes advantage of the headlines of the day...the same as her revolting husband.

Pres. Bush will not sign this. He will clearly and correctly point out the tax increase and will ask for a clean bill.

9 posted on 08/17/2007 11:10:11 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Sounds like a stealth plan

Not much stealth here...

10 posted on 08/17/2007 11:11:03 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

How about we fix it by doing the honest thing ?

Let’s split up the Federal spending evenly amongst all 300 million citizens.

$10,000 per head and we’re all done. A family of five owes $50,000. What could be fairer than that ? We all get the same government, right ?


11 posted on 08/17/2007 11:40:47 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: commish

Hillary Clinton is in a worse position. The AMT hits taxpayers in her state, but she is bankrolled by Wall Street hedge funds.

This bill will not pass the Senate.


12 posted on 08/19/2007 3:54:11 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson