Yeah Rooty Toot, "safe and legal and rare," we've heard it all before.
Pro-Life Ping
Rudy Toot is a pro-government authoritarian control freak in every other department. So this is sham reasoning.
Yes, Rudy, Clinton, and Hillary - all joined at the hip, not to mention attuned to one another’s thoughts. Unfortunately for Rudy and Hillary, they are without the snake charmer’s tongue!
If there is not a human life being murdered here, there is no one to call "mother" is there Rudy. Wake up.
I reiterate my steadfast opposition to this baby killing, gun grabbing. illegal loving Rino crossdresser.
Regards
Is Rudy shameless or what? He says THIS--after he militantly calls for USING OUR TAX DOLLARS FOR FEDERAL FUNDING FOR ABORTIONS!!!
Rudy is absolutely shameless.
Now that that fraud, Julie Annie, did not succeed in his story of a few weeks ago — claiming that he was not pro-choice — this is his new story.
What a phony.
RINO's (like Rudy),,,
should ALSO be "safe and legal and rare"!!!
I’ll vote for any Republican in the general, but I REALLY do not want someone who is not pro-life.
But even if Murphy's Law works overtime and by some insane fate Rudi is the Republican candidate, I'll still be stuck voting for him instead of Hillary or Osama, or voting for those two in effect by tossing my vote to a third party candidate.
News Flash Rudy, ain’t going to happen on my end.
“But in a society in which we don‘t want government running people‘s lives,” he said.”
Umm I think the govt has a vested interest in preventing murder. But hey I haven’t cross dressed, married my cousin, dodged the draft, cheated on my 2nd wife and advocated attacking the 2nd Amendment so what do I know.
Uh Rudy, the government was out of it until rogue SCOTUS justices created a right out of their asses.
Rudy who?
You may remember that when abortion on demand began, many, and indeed, I'm sure many of you, warned that the practice would lead to a decline in respect for human life, that the philosophical premises used to justify abortion on demand would ultimately be used to justify other attacks on the sacredness of human life -- infanticide or mercy killing. Tragically enough, those warnings proved all too true.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm
ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)
RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.
GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.
KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.
JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.
KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.
GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.
Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY
Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.
http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp
If he's so hot to keep government out of running people's lives, why did he run the lives of the thousands of law abiding NYC residents to whom his administration deliberately denied their fundamental right to self defense by refusing to process applications for gun permits without a justifiable cause or by needlessly dragging out the process until the applicant withdrew or abandoned their applications?
If what I have been told by a former NYC resident is true, if any part of the application has to be resubmitted for any reason the unjustifiably expensive application fee must be paid again. All this is unwarranted obstructionism that has undoubtedly been designed to cause applicants to give up in disgust, and that is probably why so many illegally obtained guns are found and seized by NYC police.
Legally owned and used guns are involved in only a relatively very few accidental or intentional deaths of innocent people each year in the US. But OTOH, American hired killers, aka abortionists, use scalpels, scissors, probes, suction tubes, chemicals and other utensils that would be right at home in a medieval torture chamber to murder 1,500,000 innocent unborn human babies in that same time period. So which group poses a greater danger to the lives of innocent human beings in the US, law abiding gun owners or hired baby killers?
