Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killed by the rules
Washington Times ^ | 08/17/07 | Diana West

Posted on 08/17/2007 2:26:56 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen

Now that Marcus Luttrell's book "Lone Survivor: The Eyewitness Account of Operation Redwing and the Lost Heroes of Seal Team 10" is a national bestseller, maybe Americans are ready to start discussing the core issue his story brings to light: the inverted morality, even insanity, of the American military's rules of engagement (ROE).

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bookreview; lonesurvivor; marcusluttrell; rulesofengagement; wot
This book (Lone Survivor) is a MUST read..
1 posted on 08/17/2007 2:26:57 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Somehow our military engagments have become crime scenes. This is a leftist dream and will cripple us for years to come. As a mother who has a son, up until recently I would have encouraged my son to join the military if it was his hearts desire. But sending my son into war with his hands tied behind his back is not sane and I will not do it. We are patriotic as can be, but not insane.


2 posted on 08/17/2007 2:35:42 PM PDT by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 08/17/2007 2:36:08 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Yes, will be ordering this book this week-end.


4 posted on 08/17/2007 2:39:06 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

I hope it causes the whole country to understand that the way American soldiers are dictated to wage war is totally immoral. You either go in to win, and there are many conflicts that this is a necessary evil, or you don’t go at all. We seem to be the only country in the world, outside of Israel, that these rules apply to.


5 posted on 08/17/2007 2:40:34 PM PDT by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen
The new ROE for our military are a direct result of the Vietnam era and, more recently, Desert Storm. That war gave the illusion of military precision in that we could hit targets with little collateral damage. Now, any time a civilian gets hurt or killed, the friggin’ MSM is there to make a big deal about it. We know the enemy staged numerous photos in the Israel-Lebanon battle of a year ago, why would we expect less now?

Quit trying to fight a politically correct war. Get the politicians out of the war plans and let the pros handle it. Ever since we’ve let the stupid politicians make battle decisions—Oh, you can’t bomb Hanoi...you might hurt someone—or impact the ROE, we haven’t won a war. (I don’t think we won Desert Storm, otherwise we wouldn’t have had to got back.) Crush it now while it’s still over there, and gag the politicians. If they get there way, the battle field will be Central Park rather than Baghdad.

6 posted on 08/17/2007 2:40:42 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen; river rat; Squantos; Joe Brower
Bump for later reading.


7 posted on 08/17/2007 3:05:14 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

So tell me, would it have been murder for the Seals to have killed the three Afghanis?


8 posted on 08/17/2007 3:13:07 PM PDT by Jacquerie (The New Republic - Every bit as reputable as CBS News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Jacquerie
"So tell me, would it have been murder for the Seals to have killed the three Afghanis?

It all depends on your definition of "murder"..

The wisest and most effective life extending advice I ever received - was from a semi-literate Gunny.
Two pieces of advice:
1. The ONLY fair fight is the one you win and live, and the other guy loses and dies...
2. You are on a battlefield - where thousands of armed men, women and children want you dead... They are your enemy. Do not trust anyone who is not wearing a uniform like yours, and be prepared to kill them in an instant if necessary..

It all comes down to whose life do you value most..
Your own -- or some clown who looks and acts exactly like your un-uniformed enemy?

Folks who wish to prosecute a warrior who made a decision to kill when he felt justified -- should volunteer themselves or their children to go fight future wars....

Only those cases where no plausible "self defense" or "justifiable precaution" can be shown, should be investigated.. Enemy witnesses should be disregarded unless corroborated by fellow warriors.

Without question - the ROEs in Iraq/Afghanistan are far more stringent, dangerous and closely monitored and exploited by our enemy than at any time in history..
I have no doubt that the hesitation they impose on a young warrior has led to many unnecessary dead American warriors..

What makes this so ludicrous - is that our current Islamic enemy is without question one of the least humane and most contemptible of the "Rules of War" and the minimal standards of humanity...

Most warriors exposed to hot, fast and furious fire fights in close proximity to "civilian" habitates -- took some questionable shots...
But - they're still alive....and guilt free.

10 posted on 08/18/2007 12:33:38 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
The only way to handle this is to send the lawyers in first to reconnoiter and maybe to lay down some suppressing fire.

Then send in the troops, but only after the lawyers have identified all the targets.

Oh, yeah, those lawyers have to go with a disinterested third-party lawyer, maybe from the ACLU, or, if in the Middle East, from CAIR.

On point too!

11 posted on 08/18/2007 6:07:40 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

Thanks, Kid.


12 posted on 08/21/2007 7:59:04 AM PDT by SwinneySwitch (US Constitution Article 4 Section 4..shall protect each of them against Invasion...domestic Violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson