Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
"Mitchell.........., took an equally hard line"

Correct, but inaccurate.

Mitchell took an equally hardline on enforcement but emphasized his support for giving legal status to the illegals and creating a guest worker program.

He effectively painted Hayworth and the GOP as being derelict because they refused to address the problem.

21 posted on 08/18/2007 5:36:20 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin
Mitchell took an equally hardline on enforcement but emphasized his support for giving legal status to the illegals and creating a guest worker program.

No, Mitchell did what a lot of Dem candidates did to defuse the issue, i.e., they said they supported the WH/McCain position.

He effectively painted Hayworth and the GOP as being derelict because they refused to address the problem.

The GOP controlled House passed H R 4437, which JD said wasn't strong enough. The Senate passed comprehensive immigration reform in 2006, i.e., S 2611, but the Senate Reps voted 32-23 AGAINST it.

The problem that the Reps faced was the WH, which provided the Dems cover. Immigration was not a defining issue in the Hayworth-Mitchell race, mainly because Mitchell was able to hide behind the WH and McCain. Scandal and redistricting were the main reasons Hayworth lost. I have a home in Scottsdale, which is why I am familiar with what happened.

24 posted on 08/18/2007 5:48:43 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson