Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seanrobins
I don’t understand how the author reaches the conclusions written in the last two paragraphs.
31 posted on 08/18/2007 7:45:12 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie

I agree. The one thing that the death/non-death/death again, is that bin Laden’s body temperature has been long irrelevant - except in a symbolic sense - to the war on terror. The WOT will go on if/whether/when bin Laden is disassembled into native atomic particles.

I know the Left - when convenient - drags out the “why hasn’t Bush gotten bin Laden yet” refrain. There isn’t a Freeper alive who doesn’t understand that the Left will say: (1) If bin Laden is alive == “Why hasn’t Bush caught him yet, it sooooooo terribly important to get bin Laden,” and (2) If bin Laden is dead == “Bin Laden is irrelevant.”


71 posted on 08/18/2007 8:45:37 AM PDT by seanrobins (http://www.seanrobins.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson