Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: khnyny
The timing of this movie is the most important piece of the story.

That's a tempting conclusion to draw, but was it widely known that Mitt Romney was going to be a presidential candidate when the movie was greenlighted?

39 posted on 08/18/2007 2:19:19 PM PDT by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: murdoog

~”That’s a tempting conclusion to draw, but was it widely known that Mitt Romney was going to be a presidential candidate when the movie was greenlighted?”~

That’s a valid point; the point I make is that the movie was -held- after production in order to harm Romney. It could easily have been released a year ago - it was shot in ‘05.

Romney’s pending candidacy was well known a year ago.


46 posted on 08/18/2007 2:40:15 PM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog
>>That's a tempting conclusion to draw, but was it widely known that Mitt Romney was going to be a presidential candidate when the movie was greenlighted?

Hugh Hewitt details the DNC attack machine back in 2004 requesting all public records about Romney from birth until the resent in preparation for his possible presidential run. They came up with a list and his name was on top. To date they have hit him more than any other candidate. So that the movie was made in 05 a year after the DNC started their opposition research on him may or may not be connected but it is plausible.

141 posted on 08/20/2007 9:27:06 PM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson