Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical marijuana legal in California, but feds still raid dispensaries
Los Angeles Daily News ^ | 8/19/07 | Harrison Sheppard

Posted on 08/19/2007 12:50:20 AM PDT by hole_n_one

Medical marijuana legal in California, but feds still raid dispensaries

SACRAMENTO - More than a decade after California voters approved legalized medical marijuana, an explosion of dispensaries and patients has cities and counties scrambling to regulate the operations.

In Los Angeles - where the number of dispensaries soared from just a handful to more than 200 in the past two years - stunned city officials recently passed a moratorium on new clinics until they can develop guidelines.

Hundreds of other cities up and down California have no regulations at all on medical marijuana dispensaries, including at least 28 where clinics or delivery services are operating, according to a Daily News analysis.

Law enforcement officials say a lack of local oversight could allow dispensaries to open near schools or parks, with no way for authorities to remedy the situation.

"I think they could easily be surprised," said Modesto Police Chief Roy Wasden, who chairs a statewide task force on medical marijuana. "They're not prepared for the issues that will surround dispensaries opening up."

According to Americans for Safe Access, a medical marijuana advocacy group, 26 cities and eight counties in California have ordinances allowing and regulating dispensaries.

An additional 55 cities and two counties have enacted bans (which some advocates maintain are illegal), and 75 cities and six counties have imposed temporary moratoriums.

The remainder of the state's 478 incorporated cities and 58 counties have yet to specifically address the issue.

Throughout California, there are at least 400 known medical marijuana dispensaries - and likely hundreds more that are unpublicized.

About 15,000 Californians have registered for state medical-marijuana identification cards. Because the cards are voluntary and not required to obtain medical marijuana, officials cannot say with certainty how many people actually are seeking the drug.

Pro-legalization groups estimate there are 150,000 to 200,000 medical-marijuana users in California - up from about 30,000 just five years ago.

Law enforcement agencies remain concerned about the potential for unregulated dispensaries, with their stashes of drugs and cash, to attract crime to neighborhoods.

And some of the facilities, they say, are simply profit-making enterprises that sell at stiff prices to healthy youths and the seriously ill alike.

The Los Angeles Police Department has reported an increase in crime near some facilities and has received complaints about activities, including one dispensary handing out fliers for free marijuana samples to students at Grant High School in Valley Glen.

But medical-marijuana advocates and some academic experts say such concerns are overblown.

"I think that's something that law enforcement is using as a tactic to spread fear," said Kris Hermes, a spokesman for Americans for Safe Access.

"And to intimidate city and county officials from doing what's right and what's just, which is to establish protections for these facilities and, if necessary, regulate them in some sensible way."

The Reason Foundation issued a report earlier this year saying that marijuana-related crimes have decreased since Proposition 215 - allowing medical use of marijuana in California - was passed by voters in 1996.

"Common sense would say there's no reason why a well-regulated dispensary would add to ambient crime in the neighborhood at all," said report author Skaidra Smith-Heisters.

The only factor that might contribute to crime, she said, "would be the fact that they're operating without any ground rules right now."

While the Bay Area was the first to embrace medical marijuana - and its cities were the first to figure out how to handle dispensaries - more recently the fastest growth has shifted to Los Angeles, and especially the San Fernando Valley.

Only three years ago, the city had perhaps one or two known dispensaries. Today, there are at least 150 listed in directories maintained by advocacy groups. City and law enforcement officials believe there are as many as 200 to 400.

About half of the city's known dispensaries are in the San Fernando Valley, meaning a region that has roughly 5 percent of the state's population has 19 percent of its medical marijuana facilities - more, in fact, than the entire Bay Area from San Jose to Marin County.

"The center of gravity on this shifted in the last couple of years," said Dale Gieringer, director of the California chapter of the pro-legalization group NORML.

"When it started out, everything was in Northern California."

The first clubs in Los Angeles County, he said, were established in West Hollywood by operators from the Bay Area.

"After they got established down there, it took a year or two before somebody was willing to put their toe in across the city line. Then they did, and all of a sudden, it was `Katy, bar the door.' The great cannabis rush was on," he said.

The Los Angeles City Council recently placed a moratorium on the opening of new facilities while it figures out how to deal with the growth. Council members are generally sympathetic to legitimate dispensaries that are seen as helping the seriously ill, but they want to be able to regulate them and weed out the bad actors.

Although California voters legalized medical marijuana in 1996, growth has only occurred recently because there had been confusion about how the law worked. In 2003, the state enacted legislation spelling out a series of specific regulations.

But even as the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005 essentially confirmed the validity of Proposition 215, it also upheld the federal government's right to prosecute marijuana patients under federal law.

And that has prompted growing tensions, including in Los Angeles, where the federal Drug Enforcement Agency has launched raids against dispensaries.

"We're not going to stop enforcing the federal laws now," said Sarah Pullen, spokeswoman for the DEA's Los Angeles region.

About nine states have laws permitting medical marijuana, according to Rosalie Pacula, a drug policy analyst with the RAND Corp.

But California has attracted more attention from the feds, in part, she said, because its laws are looser than other states', allowing patients to possess larger quantities and allowing dispensaries to flourish.

"If you're really interested in protecting patients, keep the quantities low," Pacula said.

Some in Congress are trying to get the DEA to back off, including Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, and Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., who are backing a bill that would block funding for prosecutions of medical-marijuana patients.

Without such protections, businesses that believe they are operating legitimately under California state law still keep a jittery eye out for federal agents and often try to maintain a low profile.

Holistic Alternative Inc., a nonprofit dispensary in Canoga Park, opened three months ago and finds it hard to attract new patients because it can't advertise.

Instead, it and other facilities rely on Internet advertising - a more discreet option than hanging a big sign out front.

David, a co-owner who asked that his last name be withheld, said he founded the dispensary with a partner who takes marijuana for medicinal purposes and wanted to help others.

"I would hope they would leave us alone because most of our patients are actually really sick," he said. "Probably 90 (percent) to 95 percent of my patients are really sick and do need the medicine.

"If they don't get it from us, I can't see these older ladies and gentlemen in their 60s and 70s walking around getting drugs off the street."

harrison.sheppard@dailynews.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wod
Throughout California, there are at least 400 known medical marijuana dispensaries - and likely hundreds more that are unpublicized.

aka "drug dealer"

1 posted on 08/19/2007 12:50:22 AM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Related thread......

DEA Raids LA Medical Marijuana Clinics

2 posted on 08/19/2007 12:58:58 AM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Federal law trumps state law ... unless it’s a sanctuary city.

Regards


3 posted on 08/19/2007 1:23:25 AM PDT by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARE SOLE
Federal law trumps state law ... unless it’s a sanctuary city.

Actually, federal law only trumps state law in the areas where the federal Constitution grants such power to the federal government. There is nothing in the Constitution that grants the federal government the power to regulate a damn thing that occurs entirely within a state's jurisdiction, so, to sidestep those pesky Constitutional limitations on federal power, the SCOTUS decided that somehow the interstate commerce clause applies to marijuana usage and sale, even when that usage or growth/sale occurs only within California state boundaries, which most of it does.

That any person who calls himself a conservative, regardless of his feelings about Marijuana use, would not be alarmed by that usurpation of power is disturbing to me.
4 posted on 08/19/2007 2:29:08 AM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
There is nothing in the Constitution that grants the federal government the power to regulate a damn thing that occurs entirely within a state's jurisdiction.

Exactly,but the States lost any say when we started the popular elections of Senators.
5 posted on 08/19/2007 2:36:22 AM PDT by guardian_of_liberty (We must bind the Government with the Chains of the Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
There is nothing in the Constitution that grants the federal government the power to regulate a damn thing that occurs entirely within a state's jurisdiction, so, to sidestep those pesky Constitutional limitations on federal power, the SCOTUS decided that somehow the interstate commerce clause

Ah yes, the almighty interstate commerce clause. The fed.gov “nose of the camel” A little something to attend to after getting the illegals out and disposing of the IRS.

6 posted on 08/19/2007 2:59:44 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

Thank you for the clarification of state’s rights - a piece of education still lacking among too many.


7 posted on 08/19/2007 5:16:36 AM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
In Los Angeles - where the number of dispensaries soared from just a handful to more than 200 in the past two years

LOL. That's a lot of "sick" people.

8 posted on 08/19/2007 5:22:12 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Pro-legalization groups estimate there are 150,000 to 200,000 medical-marijuana users in California - up from about 30,000 just five years ago.

People are getting sicker. I don't think the medicine is working.

9 posted on 08/19/2007 5:25:05 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
People are getting sicker. I don't think the medicine is working.

Using that line of reasoning, it sounds as though you are in favor of a ban on all forms of pain relief, since they don't "cure" anything.

10 posted on 08/19/2007 5:36:09 AM PDT by orlop9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

“Some in Congress are trying to get the DEA to back off, including Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, and Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., who are backing a bill that would block funding for prosecutions of medical-marijuana patients.”

Props to Rohrabacher.


11 posted on 08/19/2007 5:41:14 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (INVEST IN THE FUTURE - DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....(NO MORE CFRers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLI

Try the 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved for the States respectively, or to the people.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


12 posted on 08/19/2007 5:42:01 AM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Federalism: mortally wounded by FDR in 1935, finished off by GWB.


13 posted on 08/19/2007 11:50:59 AM PDT by gcruse (Let's strike Iran while it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson