Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS Continues to Promote False History Trashing Einstein
NewsBusters.org ^ | 8/18/07 | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 08/19/2007 7:52:03 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Mobile Vulgus

Is this part of thier fairness doctrine, I want my tax dollars pulled from this propagandist station.


41 posted on 08/19/2007 9:29:24 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
This has nothing to do with the ‘wife’ controversy, but have you all wondered why Einstein didn’t get a Nobel Prize for his work on relativity?

Perhaps his contributions were not as impressive as the Einstein pushers would have us believe?

42 posted on 08/19/2007 9:34:23 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

churchill stated...history is written by the victors....

pbs has stated...history is written by the lib/dem pbs writers.....

orwell stated....who controls the past controls the future. who controls the present controls the past....

pbs has stated....who controls the airwaves...controls the present!!!!!


43 posted on 08/19/2007 9:57:13 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

This is why I NEVER watch PBS or listen to NPR. They are nothing but a couple of tired, old, Soviet-style propaganda machines out to destroy our history, our traditions and our culture. Just a bunch of white, old hippies who hate themselves for not being born “a person of color.”


44 posted on 08/19/2007 9:58:23 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When you start seeing FR as a "hate site," it's time for you to go to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
have you all wondered why Einstein didn’t get a Nobel Prize for his work on relativity?

No. We know why and it isn't at all as you imply.

45 posted on 08/19/2007 9:58:47 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“This is just another example of how the truth and factuality mean nothing to the left.’

You mean as opposed to the anti-science creationist right?


46 posted on 08/19/2007 10:01:27 AM PDT by gcruse (Let's strike Iran while it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“When Einstein won the Nobel Prize he sent it all to his former wife.’

Well, yes... as part of their divorce settlement.


47 posted on 08/19/2007 10:09:24 AM PDT by gcruse (Let's strike Iran while it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

The movie might have errors, but the premise could still be correct. Einstein’s first wife was a physicist and she was given all the money from his Nobel prize.


48 posted on 08/19/2007 10:19:11 AM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“have you all wondered why Einstein didn’t get a Nobel Prize for his work on relativity?”

“No. We know why and it isn’t at all as you imply.”

Well, share!


49 posted on 08/19/2007 10:24:19 AM PDT by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Feminist revisionist drivel. This is the Michael Moore-on standard of ‘documentary’ —fabricated, distorted, and imagined...... pour into the ‘documentary’ whatever nonsense serves the current political agenda.


50 posted on 08/19/2007 10:28:30 AM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
Theoretical Physics accomplishments never get Nobel prizes!
It’s considered a form of Mathematics by the Nobel committee.
Alfred Nobel purposely set up his “prize” for “practical science”, practical in the sense it had to directly benefit mankind. (Of course “practical & beneficial “ as he defined “practical & beneficial”. Why not? It was his money!) The Physics prizes are all some form of Experimental Physics. The idea being experiments & the results are "practical"!)
For example, Steve Hawkings has never won a Noble Prize and John Nash’s Nobel Prize was in Economics not Mathematics ! [Game Theory (Non-cooperative game theory, I think ?) as applied to economics. ]
The Mathematics rough equivalent of the Nobel Prize is the Fields Medal. I have no idea what the Field Medal criteria is or is work in Theoretical Physics even eligible. Also I don't think the Fields Medal is as lucrative.
51 posted on 08/19/2007 10:40:58 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
Well, share!

Sure. We ought to post things after a little research rather than thinking up the worst and posting that as a guess when these things are very well known.

52 posted on 08/19/2007 11:48:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Re: the case of PBS on Einstein’s first wife -— there are so many fabrications, absurd speculations, and distortions of the known evidence that it is obvious that PBS types simply loved a feminist de-bunking of a great scientist. There is no reason at all to believe the 1st wife played any significant role in the development of any aspect of Einstein’s work. What they had was a loving relationship for a few years that faded in time. She was a mediocre student of physics for high school teachers who never advanced beyond standard undergraduate topics of the time. There is a clear statement of hers in a 1906 letter that refers to all the physics papers that HE has written and gives no hint that she played the slightest role at all. There is a lot of good info on Esterson’s website exposing the extent of the PBS fraud:

http://www.esterson.org


53 posted on 08/19/2007 12:23:06 PM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
I used to love Bill Moyers when he was press secretary for L.B.J. He would occasionally break out in giggles like he had been smoking ditch weed.
54 posted on 08/19/2007 12:29:11 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know. F Troop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Mary Todd was a kind of family rebel, and I don’t mean the Confederate kind. She married Lincoln in spite of what her sister thought.of him. Oh, yes, her family was Confederate and she lost relatives in the war. Washington held it against her. But her sentiments about were more like those of Cassius Clay than most.


55 posted on 08/19/2007 1:01:54 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

Maybe I heard it wrong, but I heard that LBJ finally got rid of him because he was so santimonius. Maybe not, but he sure is full of himself.


56 posted on 08/19/2007 1:05:17 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
Future shows will credit the discoveries made by Copernicus, Galileo, and Sir Isaac Newton to their wives.
57 posted on 08/19/2007 1:26:36 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Nothing has been going right for Sir Issac for some time now. All this quantum gibberish is bad enough , but now every time he is mentioned , he is declared to be a poofter.
58 posted on 08/19/2007 2:14:27 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know. F Troop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Theoretical Physics accomplishments never get Nobel prizes! It’s considered a form of Mathematics by the Nobel committee.

Ummm, you might want to actually look at the list of the physics recipients and the work that got them the prize.

59 posted on 08/19/2007 3:26:37 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

A bit of a stretch in Sir Isaac’s case, though. I guess they’d invent a (completely nonexistent!) boytoy instead.

< }B^)


60 posted on 08/19/2007 3:30:25 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson