Posted on 08/20/2007 4:32:42 AM PDT by Ghayyour
Tag= Lost Art,,use to play with code with my dad..
Especially after MSM photographers sprinkle brand new toys all over the pavement.
The law is "so strict" for whoever is living here illegally, regardless of their original nationality or religion. If anything, it has been applied (or not applied as the case may be) more leniently for Mexican nationals than for almost any other nationality, this one instance of a highly vocal and publicized lawbreaker notwithstanding.
Fine by me.
Thank for saying it! Nobody is forcing her to leave her son behind--she's choosing to dump the kid so she can use him as a political lever.
Then our lying leaders, pretending to be compassionate, tell us that illegals have wonderful family values.
I'm sure some do, maybe even many; but not this manipulative criminal IMO.
I picked up on a key phrase last night when Drudge was playing sound bites. Listen carefully. While she was in jail, her eight her old son was in the custody of his “legal guardian”. That means she CAN’T take him with her. Unless a court took him away from her just try doing that if the birth mother is a Crack Addict, it ain’t easy to do. This woman is very shrewd and calculated. She is no simple peasant immigrant. This was a well planned operation to fan the flames.
May I assume you're writing about the America that used to be?
Correct! She was ordered deported for using a fake SS #. That is a felony. Charge her, jail her then deport her.
I suggest we start a betting pool as to when she will return. You know she will.
They should not be since their mother's took steps to get here illegally.
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868.
Illegal Aliens don't believe they are subject to our jurisdiction and may come here when ever and how ever they please, therefore their prodigy should not be granted citizenship. Her son was allowed to speak before the Mexican Congress to plead her case, when he did so it was as a Mexican citizen pleading for the rights of his mother as a Mexican citizen.
They cannot have it both ways. Send him home to be with his mother. Send him to Mexico.
I agree with your reading of the Constitution. The courts thus far, as I understand it, have not.
Three strikes law anyone? Return three times, three felonies, and off to the work farm, for life.
I agree with you. Call me cynical, but I think this woman was bored with being stuck in the church, unable to do anything and long ignored. She needed a trip home for a wedding or two, had no money, so why not do a "speaking tour" and get a free ride? I expect to see her back in short order.
All but true, but you are talking about a country that has a definite postition on Immigration. The U.S. beginning with the President and his Immigration policy is confused, some people feel ashamed of being Americans and having so much! embarrased, because we want to be liked by world. And the fact the U.S. did not cave in outright shows a bit of back bone on our part.
No it isn't the law, and is considered such only because of a bogus decision by some judge that wasn't appealed.
Janet Reno would have burned her out. NOT
Apparently only if it’s a mexican woman and not a cuban child caught with wet feet.
The laws are the same. Muslims living here illegally are deported every day, they're just not on the six o'clock news making spectacles of themselves.
This woman chose to make herself a poster child.
We need to establish a “working jail” concept perhaps on/near large farms. People who return after deportation will serve jail time and work 8 hour days on the farm or doing whatever to offset the taxpayer expense of their illegal entry and their jail time stemming from their illegal activity.
It really roils me that stating the correct interpretation of the law (as you have done) would be considered by anyone as "insensitive". Send them all back to Mexico. Useless lot of trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.