Romney i a slippery one, ain't he? I cannot see myself ever voting for this charlatan.
To: Mobile Vulgus
And I brought in theologians. I brought in scientists, took it apart this related to embryonic cloning. And I said, "I simply have to come down on the side of life," and wrote an op-ed piece in the Boston Globe and said, "Look, here is why I am pro-life." Of course, Romney is still splitting hairs -- he supports some embryonic research and opposes other embryonic research.
Not to mention his investments in companies that do embryonic stem cell research.
2 posted on
08/20/2007 7:43:59 AM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: Mobile Vulgus
Mitt Romney sure has the peanut gallery scared.
3 posted on
08/20/2007 7:50:26 AM PDT by
elizabetty
(The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
This abortion issue drives too many people batty.
5 posted on
08/20/2007 8:00:38 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
To: Mobile Vulgus
He became pro-life as he experienced life Romney was born in 1947.
Romney only recently became pro-life.
Therefore, it took Romney almost 60 years to "experience life"?
What a load of .... .
6 posted on
08/20/2007 8:09:17 AM PDT by
jdm
To: Mobile Vulgus; CheyennePress; JCEccles; Rameumptom; Reaganesque; redgirlinabluestate; TAdams8591; ..
should we be on the watch now for all candidates who make faux pas? Should we beat them who make faux pas every few hours with a rehash press release for days?
11 posted on
08/20/2007 8:28:33 AM PDT by
restornu
(Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
To: Mobile Vulgus
Ronald Reagan’s pro-life awakening occurred around the same period of time that Roe was decided, which was in 1973. That is when we could say that the debate became public and information was readily available.
It has taken Mitt over 30 years, with all information available, to come to his pro-life decision, timed convieniently with his run for president.
To: Mobile Vulgus
I agree. This explanation of Romney’s as to his position or non-position (which is it?) reveals of a migration of thought, but there is no substantial underlying reason given for such a change. It is a double minded position, and the Scriptures tell us that a double-minded man is unstable in all his ways (James’ Epistle).
To: Mobile Vulgus
Romney told Chris Wallace that as governor Reagan was "adamantly pro-choice," and that Reagan "became pro-life as he experienced life," and presumably as his governorship evolved.
American Liar
As governor, [Ronald Reagan]
was adamantly pro-choice.
39 posted on
08/20/2007 9:36:44 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
To: Mobile Vulgus
“Romney i a slippery one, ain’t he? “
As slippery as they come.
123 posted on
08/20/2007 5:23:20 PM PDT by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter: pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
To: Mobile Vulgus
Nothing in you post worth a peanut against Romney. You should be ashamed of yourself for posting this tripe.
The frantic pace of freepers trying to trash Romney isn’t working. This is the best candidate out there and proving it every day.
124 posted on
08/20/2007 5:24:57 PM PDT by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson