Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: 14themunny
2 posted on
08/20/2007 8:22:41 AM PDT by
JRochelle
(“Never trust a man who makes toys in a land where children are forbidden.”)
To: 14themunny
According to this article, I am one of the intellectually-challenged ones.
3 posted on
08/20/2007 8:22:47 AM PDT by
marvlus
To: 14themunny
LOL! So I need some blue contacts! (or just a stay at a Holiday Inn Express :) )
4 posted on
08/20/2007 8:22:54 AM PDT by
mrsmel
To: 14themunny
Huh?
5 posted on
08/20/2007 8:23:31 AM PDT by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: 14themunny
Scientists who conducted the tests said brown-eyed people performed better at reaction time, but those with lighter eyes appeared to be better strategic thinkersYeh, that's why those blue eyed Aryan Nazis won the war.
What's that? You think they didn't?
6 posted on
08/20/2007 8:23:49 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: 14themunny
“but lighter-eyed participants proved to be more succesful in activities that required skills in time structuring and planning such as golf...”
Someone needs to tell this to Tiger Wooooooods!
7 posted on
08/20/2007 8:24:31 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(America has "jumped the shark")
To: kalee
8 posted on
08/20/2007 8:24:57 AM PDT by
Cailleach
To: 14themunny
I have brown eyes. Eye color says nothing about intelligence or ability. Oh my mom had blue and my dad had green.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
10 posted on
08/20/2007 8:26:17 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: 14themunny
A new study by U.S. scientists finds that people with blue eyes are likely to achieve more in life, intellectually, at least, than those with brown. How many of the scientists involved in this study have brown eyes? :-)
11 posted on
08/20/2007 8:26:25 AM PDT by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: 14themunny
BLUE EYES RULE! ...Frank would have been so happy to know this too...
12 posted on
08/20/2007 8:26:31 AM PDT by
NordP
(HUNTER: "The real question for Mexico--Why are your people crossing burning deserts to get away?")
To: 14themunny
Somebody better contact teacher and activist Jane Elliott. She's been jury-rigging audience exercises for years based on "new research" showing that intelligence is based on eye-color.
At the end of her exercise, she explodes the myth, says there is no such research, says this is how easy racism is, and tells people that we're all the same.
Now what will she do?
13 posted on
08/20/2007 8:27:00 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
To: 14themunny
Regardless, my blue-eyed Mrs. will continue to love her brown-eyed UNTERMENSCH.
14 posted on
08/20/2007 8:27:12 AM PDT by
VR-21
To: 14themunny
“A new study by U.S. scientists finds that people with blue eyes are likely to achieve more in life..”
What was the eye color of the scientists who conducted this study?
17 posted on
08/20/2007 8:28:00 AM PDT by
353FMG
To: 14themunny
This is so awesome. I can’t wait to pull this article out whenever the wife decides to argue with me. She’s always quoting moronic ‘studies’ on things. We’ll see how she likes this one.
18 posted on
08/20/2007 8:28:32 AM PDT by
perfect_rovian_storm
(President Hunter should appoint Senator Katherine Harris to his cabinet!)
To: 14themunny
Worthy of note is the fact that all of the scientists involved in performing the research had blue eyes.
To: 14themunny
I knew a guy who had two different eye colors!..............
20 posted on
08/20/2007 8:29:01 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: 14themunny
“It is just observed, rather than explained,”
“There’s no scientific answer yet.”
JUNK SCIENCE.
21 posted on
08/20/2007 8:29:15 AM PDT by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: 14themunny
Hmm, everyone in this article seems to be tiptoeing around one rather important piece of information-- did they control for race or ethnicity? If not, then this is just a recapitulation of
The Bell Curve.
Please note that I am not making judgments about the reasons for the well-known racial discrepancies on this kind of test, but only suggesting that it is quite plausible that this study is just a duplication of the same results.
-ccm
22 posted on
08/20/2007 8:30:07 AM PDT by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: 14themunny
Hilarious - there was a study done back in the sixties about how kids would perform better if they were told they were part of the “superior” group.
This held true, even with the same sample set of kids, when the “teacher” came back and switched which group was “superior”.
23 posted on
08/20/2007 8:30:38 AM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: 14themunny
24 posted on
08/20/2007 8:30:42 AM PDT by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson