Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CommerceComet
I still think Gore is the most viable candidate the Democrats could run.

I think Algore could win, no matter who the 'Pubbies run.

But it would be hard to run a viable primary campaign without ever getting on an airplane. And Algore knows better than to get on an airplane if he's running against Hillary!.

45 posted on 08/21/2007 6:37:15 AM PDT by gridlock (You’ll never grow old with Hillary-Care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
I think Algore could win, no matter who the 'Pubbies run.

I tend to agree with that statement. Al Gore would hold all the blue states.

Contrary to what many on this forum think, Giuliani will hold all the southern states against Hillary. That would not be true in a race with Al Gore. I don't see where Giuliani would make up for these lost red southern states against a perceived moderate Democrat like Gore.

In a battle of the Tennesseans, Gore would have an advantage in that he would have a large block of electoral votes in the blue states already locked up. Thompson would be defending more vulnerable states and Gore could really go on the offensive in battleground states. Given the current political environment, Gore would have a very good shot at carrying Ohio against Thompson. Gore came within 537 votes of carrying Florida against another southern candidate so you have to say that Florida is within his reach. Gore would probably get New Hampshire this time. The other state that I think that a moderate Democrat like Gore could pick up with hard campaigning is Missouri.

71 posted on 08/21/2007 7:06:31 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson