Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar
I don’t recall Nixon’s popularity ratings before the 1968 election, but he won the Presidency largely because George Wallace siphoned enough popular and electoral votes from Humphrey in Southern states that, at the time, were still heavily Democrat.

I agree with earlier posters who said that the biggest threats a Republican nominee faces in 2008 is a conservative third-party candidate who emerges because of dissatisfaction with that nominee.

70 posted on 08/21/2007 7:06:18 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: riverdawg

Re 1968, some say Wallace being in the race was a boost to Humphrey. Nixon even said in his book that Wallace took conservative voters away from him. Nixon’s margin might have been larger. He almost certainly would have carried TX so his electoral college margin would have been larger. Without Wallace in the race Nixon thought he would have taken an outright majority of the popular vote too.


79 posted on 08/21/2007 7:19:05 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson