Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insurance Department opposes Allstate hike [TEXAS]
Houston Chroncile ^ | Aug. 21, 2007 | PURVA PATEL

Posted on 08/21/2007 6:53:13 PM PDT by Dubya

State insurance regulators said Tuesday they have disapproved Allstate Texas Lloyd's latest home insurance rate hike of 5.9 percent, calling it excessive.

The company also from now on must file its rates for approval before they can be implemented.

Most companies can implement rates upon filing them with the state, under the ``file and use'' system put into place in late 2005. If the insurance commissioner deems the rates excessive after they've been implemented, he can order the company to pay refund along with interest.

Allstate is still reviewing the order to determine if it will appeal or if it will continue to implement the hike, spokesman Bill Mellander said.

"It doesn't change our position," he said, adding that the insurer thinks its rates are justified and competitive.

Monday, Allstate implemented a 5.9 percent hike as well as an additional average 2 percent increase in counties once and twice removed from the Gulf of Mexico, such as Harris and Montgomery counties. Last month, the company withdrew a proposed 6.9 percent rate hike last month when regulators signaled they wouldn't approve that increase.

The documents justifying the latest rate hike looked similar to the ones supporting the withdrawn increase, said Ben Gonzalez, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Insurance.

"It's still excessive and there's not enough supporting information," he said.

Read more in tomorrow's Chronicle.

purva.patel@chron.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/21/2007 6:53:14 PM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Oh darn!


2 posted on 08/21/2007 7:03:24 PM PDT by battlegearboat (Driving Danny Glover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Allstate has several billboards in the Houston area that are in Spanish. Maybe some of their illegal alien customers are high risk!


3 posted on 08/21/2007 7:05:39 PM PDT by BeckB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Allstate’s been doing some strange things down here in Texas. Thankfully, the state regulators have been smacking them down on a regular basis.

If they keep this up, there’s every chance they’re going to get kicked out of the state again.


4 posted on 08/21/2007 7:09:42 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeckB

That could be. :^)


5 posted on 08/21/2007 7:09:54 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

I find it interesting the State can them before they could a customer. Allstate the good hands people? The wash their hands after the first claim.


6 posted on 08/21/2007 7:12:57 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Spktyr

I think people forget that Insurance companies exist to make a profit. For an insurance company to make that profit, they have to collect more in premiums than they pay out in claims. Quite simple.

Despite their claims, they do not exist to “help” people. They use the avenue of insurance (betting on/against loss) as the means.

When an insurance company looks to raise premiums, that is a clear indication that they made some bad wagers. State insurance regulators exist to prevent them from going beyond to gouge consumers for extra profits.

Now - is Allstate trying to gouge or simply to control loss? That is the question. Apparently the Texas Insurance Commission thinks they are going beyond...


8 posted on 08/21/2007 7:40:26 PM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

ALLSnake Insurance!!


9 posted on 08/21/2007 7:54:40 PM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou
Allstate = thieves in motion. Had 'em for 18 years, and they screwed me royally. Only took once to get off their boat! Should have known they wanted to screw a conservative....Hey A$$state see this (Yuppers, it's one fingered salute to ya, ya liberal POS!)?


Buy anything, except for A$$state Insurance!
10 posted on 08/21/2007 8:02:26 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Duncan Hunter for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Issaquahking
I had Allstate for 10 years insuring two homes and 4 cars. Never files a claim. Last year they told me they would not renew my home insurance on my home in Northwestern Galveston county (40 miles from Gulf of Mexico).

Since I needed new insurance on that home, I started getting quotes on both houses and cars. Found out I had been grossly overpaying on my car insurance. Quickly switched all my insurance.

So Allstate will not have to worry about potential losses from me, but then again they have lost a stable stream of revenue forever. I'm sure there are others that have done the same.

12 posted on 08/22/2007 5:23:24 AM PDT by jhouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
State insurance regulators exist to prevent them from going beyond to gouge consumers for extra profits.

I must have missed something. Does Allstate have a monopoly on homeowner's insurance in Texas? Unless they do, there is absolutely no justification for any government entity to dictate their premiums. And what is an "extra profit", anyway?
13 posted on 08/22/2007 5:30:09 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: armydoc

Part of doing business in Texas (and many other states) is that you have to abide by the state insurance regulatory board.

My personal opinion is - premiums should be directly tied to the actual risk involved in insuring the property/individual. If I choose to build a home on the beach, my homeowner’s insurance (and flood insurance) should be higher than if I built the same house much farther inland - because the catastrophic risk is lower.

Just like my current homeowner’s insurance costs more where I live than it would if the same hose were closer to town. The reason - fire protection in much more limited out here in the sticks. That is my choice.

And insurance companies do often take advantage of situations and gouge consumers - particularly when someone is in a position to not be able to get other insurance.


15 posted on 08/22/2007 3:25:10 PM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson