Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emerging Markets: The Next Fed-Inspired Bubble?
http://www.thestreet.com/s/emerging-markets-the-next-fed-inspired-bubble/newsanalysis/technicalanaly ^ | 8-23-07 | John Hughes and Scott Maragioglio

Posted on 08/23/2007 6:28:05 AM PDT by Hydroshock

The Fed hit the market with a surprise 50-basis-point discount rate cut that caught many traders leaning the wrong way Friday. The rate cut came in response to the subprime crisis and is giving the credit markets the one thing that they need the most, liquidity.

Options House Zecco.com

Fidelity Investments Charles Schwab

E*TRADE FINANCIAL TD AMERITRADE

The Fed is hoping that by injecting liquidity into the credit markets, it can avert a meltdown of the financial system. If the Fed has to take further action in response to the subprime crisis and continue pouring in liquidity, we may see another asset bubble created. This time, the bubble may be created in the emerging markets.

The case for this happening is simple and hangs together well. Each time the Fed has responded to a financial crisis by lowering rates, the surge in liquidity has led to the creation of an asset bubble. Each asset bubble then collapsed and led to the next crisis.

Follow me. The 1997-98 Asian crisis led to rate cuts as the Fed poured in liquidity and stabilized the economy during the global financial crisis. This action worked, but the excess liquidity led to the technology bubble and implosion in 2001.

The bear market created by the "tech wreck" prompted the Fed to cut rates and once again inject liquidity to counteract the effect of collapsing stock prices on the economy.

The excess liquidity created this time led to the housing bubble and the subprime disaster, as lenders abandoned good lending practices during the speculative frenzy.

Now the Fed is reacting once again by cutting rates and injecting liquidity. A rational person has to see the pattern here. We believe that the excess liquidity created this time will flow someplace and create another bubble. The emerging markets are an excellent candidate.

Bubbles need a theme or a concept behind them, and it needs to be new. Investors are unlikely to create a bubble in the same asset class within living memory. What we mean by this is that traders are unlikely to go back and create a new tech bubble while the memory of the last collapse is still fresh.

A much more likely scenario is that investors find something new to get excited about and create a bubble in a fresh investment theme. The emerging-markets story has everything needed to create an asset bubble.

The opportunity there is potentially enormous, while being hard to define. It's simply a great story, and the strength of these markets over the last couple of years should attract liquidity, creating a "virtuous" cycle to the upside.

The Fed action will have consequences, and we would keep a close eye on where the liquidity flows as the Fed tries to clean up the subprime lending disaster. A relatively small amount of liquidity could push these emerging markets into overdrive in the coming year.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alasandalack; applesonly5cents; depression; despair; doom; dustbowl; fed; grapseofwrath; hoovervilles; mortgage; soupkitchens; vulturegram; woeisme

1 posted on 08/23/2007 6:28:07 AM PDT by Hydroshock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

” Emerging Markets: The Next Fed-Inspired Bubble? “

Brings to mind the Cavuto show a couple of weeks ago — where the ‘round table of experts’ spent 5 minutes telling us how the US economy is just peachy-keen-WONDERFUL and strong — and then went on to unanimously recommend investing in NON-US markets....

Ike’s Law of Talking Heads: Irony is lost on ‘experts’.....


2 posted on 08/23/2007 6:33:34 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (We has met the enemy, and he is us........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The Fed is hoping that by injecting liquidity into the credit markets, it can avert a meltdown of the financial system.

Oh, paleeeze. It must be a slow financial news day when you have to revert to terms like "meltdown of the financial system". Who are these bozos trying to kid, anyway? If they want to call it "thinning the herd" or "high risk takers take it in the shorts", fine. But, please don't even try to say the entire financial system is in the dumper.

3 posted on 08/23/2007 6:49:53 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

Not sure that is really irony. Just because the U.S. economy is strong doesn’t mean U.S. stocks are the best place to put your money over a short to medium term horizon.


4 posted on 08/23/2007 6:51:06 AM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Nailed it. I am sick and tired of this “financial meltdown” type talk. A bunch of greedy cretins lent gobs of money to people who would never ever, normally get credit and now everyone is shocked that these debts have gone sour. Yeah, a lot of these guys who swung for the fences are taking it in the shorts, and there is some collateral damage, but hardly the crisis the MSM seem to like to sensationalize!


5 posted on 08/23/2007 6:58:52 AM PDT by Obadiah (Nothing says, "Get off my lawn" like the inscription of a claymore - THIS SIDE TOWARDS THE ENEMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Round and round the wheel turns, where inflation lands, no one knows.

Will it be in bonds or equities?

Will it be here or overseas?

Will it be consumer products (quaking of the knees)?

Real estate’s shot, US equities caught, bond interest is low.

Hey, I know.

Let’s buy gold.

Too late? Oh, drat, I really, really liked that.

Wait I know, let’s buy time . . .


6 posted on 08/23/2007 6:59:01 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is the conservative in the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
Exactly! And let’s stop the next phase of verbal diarrhea about bailing out these companies and their investors. These subprime lenders made the loans, charged higher interest rates to cover the higher risks and investors bought into these companies because of the higher returns knowing full-well that they were risky investments. You and I didn't get the money from the loan and you and I didn't get the high investment returns, so don't even think about using my tax dollars to bail out the companies or their investors. Not my problem...not my gov't's problem.
7 posted on 08/23/2007 7:12:33 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Great article. The Fed is a serial bubble-blower, there can be no argument about that. The transition between the NASDAQ bubble and the housing bubble was absolutely seamless.

I guess one indicator of the next Fed-blown bubble will be when we read of some financial transaction that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. When the housing stocks were collapsing in early 2006, one fine day for no reason whatsoever one of the builders (I can’t remember which one) announced that it was going private for some ridiculous premium over the collapsing stock price, then it raised that offer like twice more in the next two months. In retrospect that must have been an early indicator of “liquidity” (the polite word for “counterfeit money”) gone wild.


8 posted on 08/23/2007 7:50:49 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Who are these bozos trying to kid, anyway? If they want to call it "thinning the herd" or "high risk takers take it in the shorts", fine. But, please don't even try to say the entire financial system is in the dumper.

The MSM always takes this attitude when covering any subject too technical to be included in a journalism degree program. A story doesn't sell papers, or site clicks, unless it's a Total! Financial! Meltdown!

9 posted on 08/23/2007 9:46:05 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
The MSM always takes this attitude when covering any subject too technical to be included in a journalism degree program.

Good point...

10 posted on 08/23/2007 10:28:17 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson