Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Like Abortion Groups "The Economist" Hopes Vatican will Lose its Status at United Nations
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | August 22, 2007 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 08/24/2007 12:01:03 AM PDT by monomaniac

Like Abortion Groups "The Economist" Hopes Vatican will Lose its Status at United Nations

Call ignores fact that all but 9 Muslim and 4 Communist nations have formal diplomatic relations with Vatican

By John-Henry Westen

NEW YORK, August 22, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Vatican has reacted to a suggestion contained in a July 19 issue of "The Economist", one of the world's leading current affairs weeklies.  Produced in the UK and controlled by the Financial Times, The Economist - the articles of which are always left unsigned since they represent a collective view - called on the Vatican to remove itself from its permanent observer status at the United Nations and become a non-governmental organization alongside the myriad of pressure groups which form the UN's body of NGOs.

Headlined, "God's Ambassadors", the article concluded, "Instead of claiming to practise a form of inter-governmental diplomacy, it could renounce its special diplomatic status and call itself what it is - the biggest non-governmental organisation in the world."

The impetus for the suggestion seems to be the same as that of the long-standing campaign by the militant abortion advocacy group 'Catholics for a Free Choice' - namely the Vatican's unwavering defence of the right to life.  The three sentences in the article which precede the final line quoted above read: "Listing the keystones of foreign policy, Cardinal Tauran stressed the 'right to life at all stages of biological development'. Statements like that make the Vatican respected in some quarters, mistrusted in others. Some activities, such as taking lethal risks for peace in Burundi, are almost universally admired. But in an age when the power of independent agencies (including Catholic ones) is growing by the day, mightn't the Vatican enhance its authority by clarifying its own status?"

The Vatican responded in the August 9 issue of Avvenire, the newspaper of the Italian bishops' conference with commentary by French Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, secretary for relations with states.  "This is certainly not an acceptable invitation!," said Archbishop Mamberti.  "It may have arisen from an imprecise understanding of the Holy See's position in the international community: a position that can be traced back to the beginning of the international community itself, and has been reinforced above all since the end of the nineteenth century."

The Archbishop pointed out that the Vatican's status is recognized by nearly 180 nations with whom it has diplomatic relations.  He noted moreover that the UN body in 2004 expanded the Vatican's privileges at the United Nations.

Top Vatican reporter Sandro Magister who provided an English translation of the interview in Avvenire, adds that with 176 nations having established diplomatic relations with the Vatican, it is easier to count the 17 nations which still do not have such diplomatic relations with the Vatican.  Nine of those are Muslim, and four Communist.

Archbishop Mamberti points to life and family issues as the motivation behind The Economist's push which he says comes as no surprise.  "This is why the Holy See's activity within the international community is often a 'sign of contradiction', because it does not cease to raise its voice in defense of the dignity of each person and of the sacredness of all human life, above all the most vulnerable, and in defense of the family founded upon marriage between one man and one woman. It does not cease to assert the fundamental right to religious freedom, and to promote relations among individuals and peoples founded upon justice and solidarity."

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
ROCKEFELLER'S PHONY "CATHOLIC" GROUP TRIES TO BOOT VATICAN FROM UN
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/1999/march/99032604.html

See the article in The Economist:
http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9516461&CFID=18489729&CFTOKEN=57816740

See Sandro Magister's coverage:
http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=162301&eng=y

To comment to The Economist:
letters@economist.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; catholic4freechoice; humanlife; prolife; theeconomist; unitednations; vatican

1 posted on 08/24/2007 12:01:06 AM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

The Vatican is just a hate group and terrorist organization in the eyes of the UN, of course Zimbabwe is the model for economic development according to the UN.


2 posted on 08/24/2007 4:05:26 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
The Economist ... called on the Vatican to remove itself from its permanent observer status at the United Nations and become a non-governmental organization alongside the myriad of pressure groups which form the UN's body of NGOs.

Umm, why? The Vatican is a government, unlike “the myriad of pressure groups”.

What would be next? Expelling San Marino because it's too small?

3 posted on 08/24/2007 5:22:22 AM PDT by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson