I suppose you are cool with that too.
I cite one quote from Heinlein's work and you attempt to tar me with something totally unrelated? What kind of silliness is that?
How would you like it if I tried to tar you in the same way with this?
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property. Exodus 21:20-21
To quote you, "I suppose you are cool with that too."
I'm not "cool with that" and I suspect you aren't either. Both "tarring" examples are silly. Try again, with reason and logic next time.
Putting Heinlein and Scripture in the same comparison is somewhat troubling.
“I cite one quote from Heinlein’s work and you attempt to tar me with something totally unrelated? What kind of silliness is that?”
My point was to show how irrelevant the quote you used was. I simply put it in perspective. Why should I consider the moral opinions of someone, fictional or not, who engages in incest as valid?