Hillery, it was your husband that, if memory serves me, signed NAFTA.
Idiot.
Has anybody bothered to remind this trash that it was LIBERALISM, and the Democratic Party that OUTFORCED all of these good jobs??
Over-Taxation,
Over-Unionization,
Over-Regulation,
Inane Enviro Rules,
and UNLIMITED CIVIL LIABILTY
have all created a high-cost environment in which many companies can no longer compete.
Add in the technical revolution that allows many jobs to be done elsewhere, even from home, and The SATANDARDIZED SHIPPING CONTAINER, that has driven shipping/handling costs to historic lows, and you have a recipe for disaster...
Interesting for the opponents of NAFTA here. Free trade is a conservative principle - when one opposes free trade one sides with unions, nanny staters and other anti-free market forces.
The Dems are triangulating here. Certain Republicans such as Ron Paul & Duncan Hunter are opposed to binding trade agreements.
If HRC were a Republican, the left and right would be united in mocking her for the outrageous BS she shovels every day.
I'm against this war I voted for... I was the co-president who signed NAFTA which I'm against... I stand for independent women but how dare you get into my personal space you mean MAN, you, oh, and we have to destroy those women Bill slept with...
I wish someone would have the cojones to really take it to this IDIOT.
"The three-nation NAFTA was signed on 17 December 1992, pending its ratification by the legislatures of the three countries. There was considerable opposition in all three countries, but in the United States it was able to secure passage after Bill Clinton made its passage a major legislative initiative in 1993."
Republicans didn't take control of Congress until 1995, after winning big in 1994. Although advocated by Bush 1 (who can not really be considered a conservative), it was passed, signed into law and implemented by the very ones complaining about it now.