Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Family files claim in slaying of boy, 16, by lawmen (Dial 911 and die)
The San Francisco Chronicle ^ | August 25, 2007 | Henry K. Lee

Posted on 08/25/2007 9:12:19 AM PDT by Reeses

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: Owl_Eagle

“Avoid dialing 911 for family problems.”

Well, I agree with that sentiment but threatening someone with a knife goes beyond “family problems”.

Calling 911 during a drunken argument(seemingly far more common) does not. I’m of the opinion that if the cops arrive and there is no danger to the caller, the caller gets to go downtown for the night. I don’t expect that to be embraced by everyone.


21 posted on 08/25/2007 9:42:42 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner
I don’t claim to be a tough guy.
but this kid was wielding a leatherman OK technically a knife but barely .
I believe two competently trained deputies should be able to take down a “slight” 16 yo without gunfire
22 posted on 08/25/2007 9:46:44 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
The Mother and Father should have handled a knife wielding psychotic threatening their son by themselves.

Inviting strangers with guns to calm your child is not always a wise option. It should be the last resort since the ending has become so predictable.

We now live with Blue Suicide just one phone call away. Scott Peterson didn't have to kill his wife to get the life insurance money, he just needed to work her up into an intense jealous rage then dial 911.

23 posted on 08/25/2007 9:49:06 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner
Santa Rosa police, who investigated the shooting, have said the deputies were forced to shoot Jeremiah after they tried to grab a knife and that the youth continued to wave the weapon after being pepper-sprayed.

From this article, it sounds like they attempted to disarm the kid with nonlethal force. Unfortunately, that failed.

Like you said, sometimes it seems people are conditioned by action movies to think that police officers should be a combination of Bruce Lee and Annie Oakley, able to physically subdue or even shoot someone without doing any permanent damage. Pity the real world doesn't work that way.

24 posted on 08/25/2007 9:59:11 AM PDT by Polonius (It's called logic, it'll help you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner

DOn’t police receive training in the use of the baton anynore? The baton can be used quite effectively in disarming a knife wielding assailant without too much risk. When you consider the police have the advantage of armor and training, it seems unreasonable that their only recourse is to shoot someone.


25 posted on 08/25/2007 10:03:02 AM PDT by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Your results may vary. Void where prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sandreckoner

DOn’t police receive training in the use of the baton anynore? The baton can be used quite effectively in disarming a knife wielding assailant without too much risk. When you consider the police have the advantage of armor and training, it seems unreasonable that their only recourse is to shoot someone.


26 posted on 08/25/2007 10:03:14 AM PDT by semaj (Just shoot the bastards! * Your results may vary. Void where prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grjr21
The only way two trained adult deputies could be scared of a 16 yo with a letherman is if they are cowards.

No, they would be fools if they were not afraid.

27 posted on 08/25/2007 10:08:22 AM PDT by Sci Fi Guy (Now more that ever let's pray for victory in the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I have a daughter-in-law who is simply crazy. She is the most divisive person I have ever know. She uses her mouth as a weapon and says the most hurtful thing she can think of anytime she gets into an argument.

You've just described my son's ex, with a tendency towards physical violence thrown in. She has assaulted my son (police report taken) and my wife (she didn't call the police but should have). My son's ex still believes the two of them are together (not gonna happen) and demands that he does not even speak to any other women for any reason, while she goes out and sleeps around with whomever. Her latest flame was just returned to prison after violating his parole by babysitting the 9 year old girl of a friend (guess why he was sent to prison). I'd like to say that my son is completely done with having to deal with this psycho (I'm a professional psychologist, so diagnosing her was not difficult), but unfortunately they created a son together. So, he, and we, have years of torture to endure from this person who has Borderline Personality Disorder. Sigh.

28 posted on 08/25/2007 10:21:50 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I have a daughter-in-law who is simply crazy. She is the most divisive person I have ever know. She uses her mouth as a weapon and says the most hurtful thing she can think of anytime she gets into an argument. I have never encountered anyone who could bring you to the point of wanting to physically attack someone as quickly or as surely as she can. I go into an encounter with her telling myself I am not going to fall for her trick again, but after just a few minutes a lifetime in prison for murder seems to be a good trade off for ridding the world of this person!

Next time your DIL starts up with her B.S., literally tell her to 'STFU, ya cumb dunt!' and tell her you've heard all about her pro al-Qaeda comments on various online forums and bulletin boards, etc., etc., and that if she doesn't shut her yap, you'll be sending all of her personal information to Michael Chertoff at DHS via Purolator Courier.

Yeah, it's a bunch of silliness, but what do you have to lose? It might scare the bejesus out of her, LOL
29 posted on 08/25/2007 10:21:55 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
No, they would be fools if they were not afraid.

 

In this case I would have to disagree .Worried yes . Cautious most definitely but two  trained officer should be able to take him down without resorting  to lethal force

30 posted on 08/25/2007 10:23:33 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
were forced to shoot Jeremiah after they tried to grab a knife and that the youth continued to wave the weapon

I avoid calling 911 because it never ever solves the problem and usually creates a much bigger problem........the Police are not to blame here. If you wave a weapon or anything that might be a weapon anywhere in the vicinity of anyone else who has a weapon it will end badly.

31 posted on 08/25/2007 10:26:27 AM PDT by badpacifist ("I don't think you understand these boys killed my dog" Bob Lee Swagger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj

“When you consider the police have the advantage of armor and training, it seems unreasonable that their only recourse is to shoot someone.”

You’re right but you’re living in the past.

When being a cop was a Man’s job no man would have been too quick to use leathal force in such a situation. He knew his actions would be diseccted afterwards and he would’nt have wanted to come under criticisim.

I’ve seen cops trying like hell to disarm a knife wielding psychotic because they felt sorry for him and didn’t want to be too quick on the trigger.

That said if I am on the jury and the kid’s got a knife and he’s charging cops....too bad for him. You just can’t second guess the cops to such a degree. But once it was a mans job and such second guessing didn’t come up except in the case of the odd coward.

For the record I HAVE faced down bats, knives, razors and once a meat-cleaver. I am not a cop and I didn’t call cops.


32 posted on 08/25/2007 10:26:49 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Yeah, but then the property values will come back down to reality.


33 posted on 08/25/2007 10:29:20 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jubal Harshaw

This was not an adult. The slain person was 16 — legally a child.
__________________________________________________________
And that means the knife he was wielding couldn’t have hurt anyone, right?


34 posted on 08/25/2007 10:34:48 AM PDT by Steamburg (Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

The 16 yo had grabbed his little brother as a hostage (in the back of the SUV or van, I forget which) and was threatening to kill him. The 16 yo was clearly having a psychotic episode, which makes him worthy of pity, but also very dangerous. I’ve followed this story from the beginning (living in the area) and unless there is more to the story that has not gotten into the paper, the deputies were not totally out of line. That said, perhaps with more training, the deputies could have found a better way to take him down than by killing him. (I don’t know about that, not being in law enforcement myself.) But it was clearly a very dangerous situation. The parents are in denial if they don’t realize that.


35 posted on 08/25/2007 10:39:46 AM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
"The parents called the Fire Department for help, and instead of getting help, the son was shot eight times,
Uh, did they want them to hose him down?
36 posted on 08/25/2007 10:40:42 AM PDT by jimboster (fROM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj
Good point, nothing like an ASP strike on the elbow to take the wind out of your sails.

Or a 12GA beanbag hit - cops here use the beanbag and TASER before they pull their service weapons. When they do, you can count on someone going to the morgue.....

37 posted on 08/25/2007 10:41:09 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

NO cop ever wants to get a domestic, regardless of the circumstances, trust me.

I can still see the female cop breaking down after she and her partner responded to one that I was involved in as a kid.

Domestic calls are always a mess.


38 posted on 08/25/2007 10:46:17 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: L98Fiero
I’m of the opinion that if the cops arrive and there is no danger to the caller, the caller gets to go downtown for the night.

What if you see someone breaking into your neighbor's home while he's not there?

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.

40 posted on 08/25/2007 10:59:25 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson