Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

An interest contrast to an early posted article on a bail out of teh subprime mortgage industry.
1 posted on 08/27/2007 11:02:51 AM PDT by Hydroshock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hydroshock; Moonman62; Always Right; RockinRight; ex-Texan

Your thoughts.


2 posted on 08/27/2007 11:09:22 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

How do you even attempt to bail out only the “good guys” without also bailing out “the bad guys”?


3 posted on 08/27/2007 11:09:25 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

We can’t and should not bail out everyone.


5 posted on 08/27/2007 11:10:39 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

The only people who are getting burned are those who stupidly bought more house than they needed because they could get a subprime ARM and those who bought houses at artificially inflated prices hoping to flip them for twice the money in 6 months. I have little pity for either.


8 posted on 08/27/2007 11:30:57 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
He argued that a 10% fall in prices nationwide could set off price deflation of a kind not seen since the Great Depression

I know how to prevent deflation. Cut those rates.

19 posted on 08/27/2007 11:44:07 AM PDT by NeoCaveman ("I mean, he's gone from Jane Fonda to Dr. Strangelove in one week." - Romney on B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Mish's take

The top five holdings of Pimco's Total Return Fund are as follows.

1) Fannie Mae

2) Fannie Mae

3) Fannie Mae

4) Fannie Mae

5) Fannie Mae

22 posted on 08/27/2007 11:49:32 AM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

And here I was wondering why Bruce Bochy was commenting on the sub-prime market when he should be much more concerned with managing the Giants. :=)


23 posted on 08/27/2007 11:50:06 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

bump


30 posted on 08/27/2007 12:19:28 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW , Vote Hunter in the Primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

None of the articles mention private mortgage insurance, these high risk loans required PMI for mortgages with less than 20% down.


31 posted on 08/27/2007 12:26:12 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

You could, frankly, go further. Many other forgotten people rented during the real estate bubble. They wisely shunned the hype and refused to take on too much debt to buy a home they couldn’t afford.

Where are they now?

If politicians jump on Gross’ proposal, these people would be forced to pay higher taxes in order to save other, less prudent people from the alleged indignity... of having to rent.

The quote says it all in a nutshell.

Overall, a very well reasoned and rational assessment of what should be done and of what to expect and why. Home prices in some areas went up so fast and so high, artificially, that a good bump down is warranted. This is a crisis, not a catastrophe. In my finantial ignorance, I expect to see the economy in a mild recession next year, before a healthy economy bounces back strongly. Who knows?

Nice balanced assessment without the extemism either way.

Great post. Thanks!


32 posted on 08/27/2007 12:36:11 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

bump


43 posted on 08/27/2007 1:45:42 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock

Bump

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1887280/posts?page=45#45


46 posted on 08/28/2007 3:09:58 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hydroshock
Bill Gross was 'right on' in his comments about bailing out people trapped in fraudulent mortgages. Bush's latest proposal will help on about 100,000 + home buyers with good credit. Millions are adversely impacted by mortgages designed to go bad. Millions more will be adversely impacted by mortgage servicing fraud -- recording payments as late even when they were paid timely.

Only about 100,000 will be helped. All the others will lose their houses.

Do not believe the mortgage company shills who say 'Lenders lose money on foreclosures.' Historically, lenders make tons of money on foreclosures: All the bogus late fees, surcharges, penalties and bogus attorney fees and costs assessed to home buyers. Lenders make lots of money when foreclosures are filed within the first seven years.

But this may turn out to be the first time in history where lenders will lose money. Inflated home prices are falling all across the U.S. Homes will go for 50% of less of original purchase prices. Mortgage bond holders and lenders will eat the losses. So be it. Serves them right. JMHO.

51 posted on 09/02/2007 2:05:40 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson