Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP candidates: Ramp up cancer fight [Huckabee--Ban public smoking]
Yahoo ^ | 8/28/07 | LIZ SIDOTI,

Posted on 08/28/2007 1:03:29 PM PDT by ZGuy

Republican presidential hopefuls Mike Huckabee and Sam Brownback on Tuesday suggested that as president they would increase federal spending for cancer research and focus more on preventing the disease.

"We are about to see a tsunami of cancer in America" because the graying of the Baby Boomer generation means more people are reaching ages in which the risk of cancer is higher, said Brownback, himself a skin cancer survivor. "If you have a tsunami coming, you don't just wait to count the dead bodies, you get prepared."

Said Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor and healthy-living advocate known for his dramatic 110-pound weight loss: "If we spend money on the front end preventing and researching, we'd spend a lot less of it on the back end" because there would be fewer people needing to undergo expensive treatments for the chronic disease.

"Study after study show the return on investment," he added.

The two, considered second-tier GOP contenders, appeared separately at a forum sponsored by Lance Armstrong, a seven-time Tour de France champion cyclist and a cancer survivor. All Republican presidential candidates were invited, but none of the leading contenders — including cancer survivors Rudy Giuliani and John McCain — were present.

Earlier, in Washington, Mitt Romney, a former governor who made health care reform his signature issue in Massachusetts, told breast cancer survivors that their disease "is getting less than a fair shake" when it comes to research funding and suggested that he, too, would be open to a funding boost. "There's no substitute for funding," he said at a conference of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a 25-year-old network of breast cancer survivors.

At the Armstrong-sponsored forum in the leadoff caucus state, Brownback called for ending deaths by cancer in 10 years, and said reaching that goal may take a "substantial" increase of the current research budget. The National Cancer Institute had a $4.8 billion budget in fiscal year 2005, and nearly half of that was allocated for research project grants.

Additionally, the Kansas senator said a vaccine against a virus that causes cervical cancer should be "accessible and cheap." But he said he was hesitant for the federal government to require the vaccination as some states have done.

Huckabee, for his part, argued that the United States can afford to fight the wars in Iraq and on terrorism, as well as a war on cancer and all chronic diseases. "It's not a matter of picking and choosing which wars to fight," he said.

He also said that if he were president, he would sign a bill to outlaw smoking nationwide in public places, and said he would go further to say "no smoking in any indoor area where people have to work."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cancer; electionpresident; nannystate; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

1 posted on 08/28/2007 1:03:31 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
means more people are reaching ages in which the risk of cancer is higher

IOW, because life expectancies are growing, we need to spend tax dollars on curing diseases of the aged.

2 posted on 08/28/2007 1:06:13 PM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
I don't see why all these local smoking ordnances aren't struck down because tobacco is a legal product in the United States.

If 'they' want to ban smoking, they need to outlaw tobacco!

3 posted on 08/28/2007 1:06:27 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Huckabee also said that if he were president, he would sign a bill to outlaw smoking nationwide in public places, and said he would go further to say "no smoking in any indoor area where people have to work."

What a maroon! This is exactly the sort of nanny state candidate we don't need. Conservative? Like Carrie Nation, maybe! No thanks!

4 posted on 08/28/2007 1:06:44 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

RINO nannyist bullsh•t!


5 posted on 08/28/2007 1:08:12 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

We are actually winning the war on cancer. But we aren’t doing it with miracle weapons. It is a slow steady progression. We are going to see a wave [not a tsunami] of increased deaths as baby boomers age, and it’s going to be from all causes. More old people means more deaths.


6 posted on 08/28/2007 1:08:15 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci

This guy would be a food nazi also.


7 posted on 08/28/2007 1:09:05 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

He also said that if he were president, he would sign a bill to outlaw smoking nationwide in public places, and said he would go further to say “no smoking in any indoor area where people have to work.”

How liberal of you Mike.


8 posted on 08/28/2007 1:09:25 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Anti-smoking legislation is nothing more than big-government control

First its cigarettes...then it will be Big Macs...

Huckabee could be a more effective health advocate thru the bully pulpit than thru socialist legislation


9 posted on 08/28/2007 1:09:36 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

“Huckabee, for his part, argued that the United States can afford to fight the wars in Iraq and on terrorism, as well as a war on cancer and all chronic diseases. “It’s not a matter of picking and choosing which wars to fight,” he said.

He also said that if he were president, he would sign a bill to outlaw smoking nationwide in public places, and said he would go further to say “no smoking in any indoor area where people have to work.””

PING!


10 posted on 08/28/2007 1:09:54 PM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux
We are actually winning the war on cancer. But we aren’t doing it with miracle weapons. It is a slow steady progression. We are going to see a wave [not a tsunami] of increased deaths as baby boomers age, and it’s going to be from all causes. More old people means more deaths.

Meanwhile, we're often one or two antibiotics away from losing the battle against infectious disease. If that goes to zero, cancer will cease to be much of a problem.

11 posted on 08/28/2007 1:10:00 PM PDT by dirtboy (Chertoff needs to move out of DC, not move to Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
Yet another candidate that lost my support because they act more like fascists than Republicans.

Buh-bye, Huck: We hardly knew ye'.

12 posted on 08/28/2007 1:10:05 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Great. Huckabee is running as Supernanny.


13 posted on 08/28/2007 1:10:26 PM PDT by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Huckabee, you stupid frickin idiot.


14 posted on 08/28/2007 1:11:56 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
"There's no substitute for funding," he said at a conference of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a 25-year-old network of breast cancer survivors.

snip

At the Armstrong-sponsored forum in the leadoff caucus state, Brownback called for ending deaths by cancer in 10 years, and said reaching that goal may take a "substantial" increase of the current research budget.

snip

Huckabee, for his part, argued that the United States can afford to fight the wars in Iraq and on terrorism, as well as a war on cancer and all chronic diseases. "It's not a matter of picking and choosing which wars to fight," he said. He also said that if he were president, he would sign a bill to outlaw smoking nationwide in public places, and said he would go further to say "no smoking in any indoor area where people have to work."

And this guy is supposed to be some great conservative? What a joke!

15 posted on 08/28/2007 1:12:15 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci

Mitt for socialized health care (when he isn’t flip flopping and campaigning for spending more money on cancer research), Fred was a co-sponsor of McCain Feingold and was a lobbyist for Aristide, and Rudy.....well....no need to comment. A pretty pathetic set of choices.


16 posted on 08/28/2007 1:12:25 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
To think just two days ago on Fox Nooz Sunday he was saying Club for Growth was distorting his record on taxes and spending.

Then he turns around and shows his Pander Bear true colors.

17 posted on 08/28/2007 1:12:39 PM PDT by dirtboy (Chertoff needs to move out of DC, not move to Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007; AuntB; Antoninus; Calpernia; WalterSkinner; RasterMaster; ...

nanny state PING


18 posted on 08/28/2007 1:12:58 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inkling

The more I hear from Huckabee the less I like him. We’d hardly be worse off if Bloomberg were the nominee, I think.

Huckabee is said to be at the top of the list of potential running mates for Giuliani or Romney. This does not give me a good feeling.


19 posted on 08/28/2007 1:13:21 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Yet another candidate that lost my support because they act more like fascists than Republicans.

Bump. Goodbye.

20 posted on 08/28/2007 1:14:31 PM PDT by 4CJ (Annoy a liberal, honour Christians and our gallant Confederate dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson