Second Catholic Leader Quits Amnesty International Over Abortion Stance

LifeNews.com ^ | August 28, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

[monomaniac]

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 28, 2007

Glasgow, Scotland (LifeNews.com) -- A second leading Catholic official has resigned his membership with Amnesty International over the human rights group's decision to support abortion. Cardinal Keith O'Brien of Scotland said he could not longer be affiliated with the organization after joining as a student more than 40 years ago.

The head of the Catholic Church in Scotland wrote the director of the group and said it gave him "great sadness" to renounce his membership but he can't support a group that opposes "basic right to human life."

"As a matter of conscience and with great sadness I have decided to resign from Amnesty International having first joined as a student and supported it over many decades," Cardinal O'Brien wrote about his decision.

"In recent years I have spoken out strongly on pro-life issues including our necessity to ensure life for the poorest people of the world and have shown my care and concern by visiting some of those poorest countries especially in Africa and Asia," he explained.

"Sadly now Amnesty International seems to be placing itself at the forefront of a campaign for a universal 'right' to abortion in contravention to that basic right to human life," the Catholic official said.

John Watson, Scottish program director of Amnesty International, responded to the resignation in comments to the Scotsman newspaper.

He said Cardinal O'Brien "misrepresents our repeated statements that we are not" promoting a universal right to abortion.

Cardinal O'Brien's leaving Amnesty follows that of Bishop Michael Evans of East Anglia who said the group's pro-abortion position would divide its membership and hurts its less controversial work.

"If Amnesty International becomes an organization which affirms the right to abortion, even under certain circumstances, it is free democratically to do so," Bishop Evans told the BBC.

"But it cannot expect those of us who are just as passionate about the human rights of the unborn child to feel at ease being part of such an organization," he added.

[Norman Bates]

Hopefully the funds from Catholics dry up.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I was with Amnesty International years ago. Then, the leadership insisted that every local group support three “Prisoners of Conscience” (victims of political or religious persecutions): one from the “First World” (the developed and prosperous West); one from the “Second World” (victims of Communist regimes); and one from the “Third World” (a poor and underdeveloped nation.)

Local AI groups could not pick-and-choose which “Prisoners of Conscience” to support. AI defended the basic human rights of ALL.

This makes their present support of abortion without limit-— abortion at any time, by any person, for any reason — particularly disgusting.

To take the hardest case: women impregnated by rape in wartime. Surely they need sanctuary and unstinting practical help and quite possibly a large-scale adoption program for their babes; but surely that “help” must not consist of making their bodies the target of another violent attack so that their helpless babies will be butchered.

How can an organization which opposes the death penalty even for the rapist, insist upon it for the child? This child, like its mother, is an innocent human being. The most fundamental human right is the right to simply go on living.