Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What say you now, Hillary? (Mr. Hsu)
michellemalkin.com ^ | 09/29/07 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 08/29/2007 10:11:25 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: shortstop
The more things change ... ;-)

(bump)

61 posted on 08/29/2007 1:53:32 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here. ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

If Hillary is implicated, Bruce Lindsey (aka Mr. Fixit) will arrange for someone’s untimely demise.


62 posted on 08/29/2007 2:32:50 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; pissant

>What would that say about the American people?<

Let’s just hope their vote won’t be bought. There are those among us who think they can be, because they constantly say that my candidate can’t win because he doesn’t have enough $$$.

I say that what my candidate has cannot be bought with $$$.


63 posted on 08/29/2007 4:56:40 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

>Red China, Warren Buffet AND George Soros is supporting her highnes...how can we complete.<

By not buying it!


64 posted on 08/29/2007 4:58:36 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
It is as if they are shell companies for the purpose of political donations only.

It would be easy to set up a sham corporation and have money funnelled into it and then hire consultants who take half or 3/4 of what they earn and use it for political donations and keep the rest for themselves. I suspect that there are hundreds, if not thousands of these little sham corporations out there that exist for no other purpose but to launder money into political campaigns.

65 posted on 08/29/2007 5:32:21 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Remember the pretty in pink interview? Maybe she wears PINK because she is RED on the inside. Pinko commie red. I tell you if she wins/steals the election, I do not know what I will do. Eight years of her so called “husband” was too much for me! I do not really like any of the candidates on either side. I may have to hold my nose to vote, period.


66 posted on 08/29/2007 6:15:23 PM PDT by buffyt (FREE RAMOS & CAMPEAN! NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
Heretical Thoughts About Science and Society [Freeman Dyson chides global warming alarmists]

What he says here...

To conclude this piece I come to my third and last heresy. My third heresy says that the United States has less than a century left of its turn as top nation. Since the modern nation-state was invented around the year 1500, a succession of countries have taken turns at being top nation, first Spain, then France, Britain, America. Each turn lasted about 150 years. Ours began in 1920, so it should end about 2070. The reason why each top nation’s turn comes to an end is that the top nation becomes over-extended, militarily, economically and politically. Greater and greater efforts are required to maintain the number one position. Finally the over-extension becomes so extreme that the structure collapses. Already we can see in the American posture today some clear symptoms of over-extension. Who will be the next top nation? China is the obvious candidate. After that it might be India or Brazil. We should be asking ourselves, not how to live in an America-dominated world, but how to prepare for a world that is not America-dominated. That may be the most important problem for the next generation of Americans to solve. How does a people that thinks of itself as number one yield gracefully to become number two?

...scares the hell out of me.

I'll be dead, but I care about my children, and their children.

The saving grace in this is that he earlier admits to frequently being wrong with regard to social predictions.

All Good to You and Yours.

67 posted on 08/29/2007 6:57:37 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Hillery only returned this particular contribution because she got caught. Only reason.

The Clintons seem to be owned by China.

Bush seems to be owned by Mexico.

Carter seems to be owned by space aliens.

Who speaks for the USA? (noone in the White House for the last upteen years).


68 posted on 08/29/2007 8:07:33 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
[What say you now, Hillary? ]
 
"People who live in glass houses should not throw stones".
 
Ameriquest's centrist sub-prime loot has contaminated both sides of the aisle.
 
http://www.dailynewstranscript.com/opinion/x1846589066
 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Arnall+Bush
 
 
GW should ask for Arnall's resignation.

69 posted on 08/29/2007 8:45:21 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Mark Belling (sp?) was ranting about the Senator Craig case, and I wanted him to point out that if a politician is in an embarrassing story you can always tell if the politician is a Republican or a Democrat. If he’s a Republican, the article will say so up front. If he’s a Democrat, the article will not refer to his political party.


70 posted on 08/30/2007 2:24:51 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Progress.

Then again, the reporter WAS from the NY Times. All that means is now the MSM can’t say the MSM doesn’t know.


71 posted on 08/30/2007 2:55:54 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
It would be easy to set up a sham corporation and have money funnelled into it and then hire consultants who take half or 3/4 of what they earn and use it for political donations and keep the rest for themselves. I suspect that there are hundreds, if not thousands of these little sham corporations out there that exist for no other purpose but to launder money into political campaigns.

Thought that was how Al Gore had already set up his carbon-tax-write-off schemes....

72 posted on 08/30/2007 2:58:04 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; neverdem; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
Interesting.

Did you notice that BOTH Hsu and the “Paw” have the same links (and re-spellings of the same links) to the same group of the same companies ...

And lived in the same house?

And donated the same pattern of money to Hillary’s campaign at the same times?

So .. Has anyone actually interviewed Mr Winkle Paw? He seems to be a perfect “cover” for Hsu’s money laundering. Er, campaign donations.

73 posted on 08/30/2007 3:04:53 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

What are the odds that they slap with additional charges for flight, ect? I’m figgering bout Infinity to zero against. If it were a ‘pub you could reverse those odds.


74 posted on 08/30/2007 3:07:50 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52

****Hillery only returned this particular contribution because she got caught. Only reason.****

She’s not afraid. Her pipeline is probably rigged as such that “sending the money back” only moves it on through the lines once again, and into her coffers via some other resident living in a green house under another flight line somewhere.


75 posted on 08/30/2007 6:40:59 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I’m working on something and will get back to you...


76 posted on 08/30/2007 6:43:45 AM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Call me naive, but isn't this a pattern. Chinese military money including Gore picking up the checks at the Buddhist Temple in Rowland Heights, CA; drug dealers at white house breakfasts, wanted criminal's wife donating for the library, ..........................

Why are these people in office and better yet, is there no shame left in America?

77 posted on 08/30/2007 9:21:09 AM PDT by pierstroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson