There is no way, whatsoever, that Hillary Clinton defeats any republican candidate in the deep south, part of the mid-West, Alaska and all that. Even if the republican candidate was caught with a dead prostitute in his bed, he'd still win frickin' Idaho.
From deep in the heart of frickin Idaho , you’re frickin right .
If you know anything about the Deep South (where I orginated) then you should know that the demographics hardly bodes well for Mitt. Firstly, 40 percent of the Deep South are African-American solidly democratic voters, another 30 percent are Southern Baptists who will flat tell you that Mormon's aren't Christians so they won't vote for one (just ask any Mormon Missionary that ever been there and had his face slammed by a door). Ten percent are textile workers who mostly lean democratic (Fritz Hollings supporters); and that just leaves the 20 percent left (me), who suspect Mitt's credentials as a conservative and who are certain that he was a draft resister during Vietnam.
The 'toons may not be able to win Idaho, but they can win parts of the deep south and mid-west the same way they did in '92 and '96 -- if a third-party candidate runs to the right of the GOP nomination. In '92, the 'toons won Louisiana, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky and Georgia, and in '96 they won Louisiana, Arkansas, Tennessee and Kentucky.