[Revelation 911]

SOUTH BEND, Ind. -- Authorities said they removed nearly 80,000 rounds of ammunition from the home of a South Bend man who warned that the world was going to end.

But that wasnt the cause for the removal - he violated the terms of a restraining order

I know folks with half that amount who feel the same way - no law broken.......much to the dismay of democrats

[Buffalo Head]

"....when the price of ammo jumps - once again - later in the year."

ATK, Remington and Winchester have announced a 15% price increase effective tomorrow - not later in the year. The "Hillary Panic of 07" is well underway. The ammunition manufacturers are back ordered many months. Some law enforcement agencies can not obtain ammunition.

[Sigurdrifta]

Somewhere (”Seven myths of gun control” by Richard Poe(?))
I seem to recall reading that according to federal law you cannot keep weapons if you are under a restraining order. Doesn’t sound right (and this is “weapons”, not “ammunition”), but who knows?

[Sir Gawain]

he violated the terms of a restraining order

Anyone can take out a restraining order against you. Under this scenario, you can force the entire state to disarm if all it takes is to get a restraining order in order to make ammo illegal.

[Calpernia]

>>>he violated the terms of a restraining order

As far as I understand, anyone can take out a restraining order on someone. The article doesn’t say if it was a temporary one (without a court hearing) or a perminent one.

And if he was found to be a threat to himself or others, he could have been committed; but he wasn’t.

[Jet Jaguar]

“...South Bend man who warned that the world was going to end.”

Did he specify a date? If not, the guy is correct.