To: rottndog
And there, I believe, is an Achilles heal of the nuc boat. If they are so close tactically, why not just buy 10 diesels for the cost of one nuc? We don't have a coastal defense navy. Our subs spend most of their time thousands of miles offshore taking the fight to our opponents. A nuke can get to the conflict quicker and with more stealth, and remain on station longer once there, than a diesel can. They're faster, longer ranged, carry more weapons, and offer more flexibility. If all we were worried about was keeping enemy subs out of the Caribbean then I'd agree with you. But our theater of operations is much larger than that.
65 posted on
08/31/2007 12:52:52 PM PDT by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: Non-Sequitur
But our theater of operations is much larger than that.
With so many hostile nations building boats, this is likely not to be the case much longer.
67 posted on
08/31/2007 12:57:08 PM PDT by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson