Suddenly the NYTs runs a article worrying about Saddams nuclear information being on the internet, Gee the NYTs tells people everyday that Saddam didn't have WMDs and was pretty much just a benevolent dictator. The next morning in Congress the dims were foaming at the mouth that this information needed to be hidden, Something they can't manage to do when it comes to actual rouge countries such as N Korea or Iran. Perhaps you have a better explaination for why a newspaper which has and will publish classified information which would harm the USAs interests suddenly finds some information which it thinks shouldn't be available. My experience tells me it was the other documents which were exposing the truth about Saddam, WMDs and terror organizations that the NYTs and the Dims wanted silenced. So what is it do you have some insight which shows why the NYTs suddenly admitted that Saddam had a nuclear program and that it was so dangerous it should never see the light of day? But bring very good information because as I said I followed the document release closely and I know many documents were not supporting the liberal mantra about Saddam. After all everyone knows the NYTs wouldn't run interference in promotion of the progressive agenda, like leaking very real programs which imperil not only the USAs security but agents in the field as well.
Check out what Peter D. Zimmerman said in this ABC report.
I wish there was a transcript. I had to do the best I could quoting what he had stated in the video
“We found one right wing website that said we were nuts. That we didn’t have a way to build a dirty bomb and we were just trying to use the T-word (Terrorism) to get grant money for our research.”
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s2006971.htm
However; they suddenly are concerned about releasing classified when it justifies the U.S. action in Iraq.
These are indisputable facts. Are you still calling for tin foil? Give it to me straight Doctor, I can take it.