Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rushmore Rocks; Cindy; nwctwx; ExSoldier; Oorang; Velveeta; All

After reading OBL’s rambling missive, three things jump out at me.

1. Attack on the ‘capitolists’. This has its parallels in the attacks on the twin towers. It would infer from the vitriol against it that OBL still wants to target the US financial center(s), probably New York, as he sees them as the ones motivating the war against him.

2. Disposing of our Democratic system. The target that he couldn’t reach on 9/11 - the White House and the Capitol - both symbols of our democracy.

3. The on the side reference to the anniversary of the use of the atomic bomb against Japan. Its context is the ‘genocide’ of non-islamics (the West) against peoples of the world/ N. America. With the concerns of his getting his hands on a nuke(s), it presence is potentially significant. Others have noticed this too, an I’m going to go back and try to wade through it in a little more detail.

A major attack would significantly impact our economy again as it is in its most fragile condition since 9/11 due to the subprime crisis. Thus conditions are ripe to attempt to duplicate the effects that 9/11 created. If nuclear, the ramifications could be severe.


520 posted on 09/07/2007 4:20:26 PM PDT by Godzilla (Why is 'abbreviation' such a long word?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla

Again, I think it’s fake. I do think we are about to get hit hard. The ones that hit us will want us to think it’s bin laden, so we won’t retaliate against them, initially and after they see how the attack goes fail or no fail, we may be in for a real all out global war.


522 posted on 09/07/2007 4:23:44 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla
Thank’s Godzilla.

So, summing it up, UBL wants to continue his agenda and his mission until it is completed.

Jihad — another day.

Just a note...I believe that “rambling” speech was more of a set of talking points vs. an in-depth speech on a given topic.

523 posted on 09/07/2007 4:26:21 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla

Thanks for your thoughts, very troubling to think what we are in for again.


534 posted on 09/07/2007 5:08:03 PM PDT by WestCoastGal (***81***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson