Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nicaragua Supreme Court to Rule on Abortion Ban in Next Two Weeks
LifeNews.com ^ | August 31, 2007 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/01/2007 8:19:31 PM PDT by monomaniac

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 31,
2007

Managua Nicaragua (LifeNews.com) -- The Supreme Court in Nicaragua is expected to issue a ruling on the nation's abortion ban in the next two weeks. The Central American nation adopted the complete ban last November that prohibits all abortions, including those for rape and incest or to save the life of the mother.

Abortion advocates, led by the New York-based Americas for Human Rights Watch, have taken the law to court.

The nation's high court is expected to deliver a decision in the case soon and it could result in the undermining of other pro-life laws in the region.

In a statement LifeNews.com received on Friday, Human Rights Watch claimed the ban violates international human rights standards and outs women's health at risk. That's despite research showing significant medical problems and health effects for women who have abortions.

“International law prohibits bans on abortion because such restrictions deny women their basic rights to life and health,” José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at HRW, said. “Nicaragua's abortion ban is an affront to international standards -- and Nicaragua's women.”

The group released an open letter it wrote to Nicaragua’s Supreme Court in which it detailed a list of treaties and documents it alleges the abortion ban violates.

HRW also claimed that it has discovered evidence of the ban's harmful impact on women.

"During a research mission to Nicaragua in August, Human Rights Watch documented delays in the provision of obstetric emergency care in the public health sector that resulted in avoidable fatalities," the group asserts.

However, Colin Mason of the Population Research Institute says HRW and other pro-abortion groups promoted a bogus case that was factually incorrect and was only meant to promote abortion.

Should they lose in the Nicaragua court, abortion advocates will head to the United Nations Human Rights Commission in New York or the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The latter, an autonomous organ of the Organization of American States, says the new law is contrary to international documents.

Both agencies have issued previous rulings against Mexico and Peru in abortion cases.

Abortion advocates say the pro-life laws are resulting in the maternal deaths of women who have illegal abortions and Ipas estimates 30,000 Nicaraguan women have illegal abortions annually.

However, legalizing abortion in industrialized nations hasn't made it any safer and Susan Yoshihara of Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute says she doubts the figures are accurate. She also said that most any doctor is willing to treat women following complications from an abortion.

The abortion ban put Nicaragua in league with thirty-four nations across the globe that prohibit all abortions.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionban; centralamerica; humanlife; internationallaw; killing; nicaragua; proabortion; prolife; supremecourt; treaties; unborn

1 posted on 09/01/2007 8:19:39 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Am I presumptuous in asking what the policy was during the reign of Commandante Danny? Now that he is back in charge, am I presumptuous in assuming the High Court will rule as he wishes?


2 posted on 09/01/2007 8:24:06 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
the pro-life laws are resulting in the maternal deaths of women who have illegal abortions

Am I, as a woman, supposed to feel horrible about that? They could have avoided dying by not trying to kill their own baby.

3 posted on 09/01/2007 8:31:51 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time! (http://www.byj.co.kr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Ortega has played it smart as in not trying to offend the moral values of the country openly.

His legislators backed this law.

Of course how his judges on the Supreme Court will rule is another thing.

I understand half the Supreme Court is Sandinista.

That’s how the parties shared power in Nicaragua in recent years.

Ortega could end up saying “we must obey the law of the land” if the judges rule against the pro-life law.


4 posted on 09/02/2007 3:38:34 AM PDT by Nextrush (Proudly uncommitted in the 2008 race for president for now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson