Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy
Personally I do not think that Spector is doing the Repulicans any favours here. And the difference between Vitter and Craig is that Craig admitted an offense which now later he is trying to get over turned.
73 posted on 09/02/2007 6:15:15 AM PDT by snugs ((An English Cheney Chick - Big Time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: snugs
"Personally I do not think that Spector is doing the Repulicans any favours here.

That is why, dear Snugs, he is so often the guest on the Sunday shows. The DBM loves fellows like him. He vindicates their biases.

88 posted on 09/02/2007 6:22:39 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: snugs
... the difference between Vitter and Craig is that Craig admitted an offense which now later he is trying to get over turned.

But Craig didn't admit to any sexual behavior, gay or not.  That's part of what's bugging me about the coverage of this and the piling on, particularly by Republicans.

Larry Craig plead guilty to “disorderly conduct,” which may be an “offense” but it isn’t admitting to cruising for gay sex in a public washroom. At no time has he admitted to being gay or to trying to solicit sex from the gay baiting cop. If you listen to the audio tape of the "interview" by the police he reacts exactly as an innocent person would, IMO and continuous to insist that he didn't do what the cop says and that he wasn't soliciting anything.

He agreed to a plea and a fine for "disorderly conduct" to avoid a public trial and get on with his life. A cop can assert that someone is “disorderly” and there’s not very much a citizen can do to counter that claim. The police are presumed to be truthful 99% of the time in court proceedings involving such charges. It’s usually a no win proposition to try to fight that sort of charge.

What I want to know is how did the story get out into the public domain? Who leaked the information and why? This is starting to look more and more like a set up to me. Craig has been targeted by the left, particularly the pink triangle nihilists, for quite some time. Notice how this is repeatedly being tied to his vote against “hate crime” legislation that set aside special privileges and protections for gays and special punishments for anyone who “offends” them. I’m getting suspicious.

233 posted on 09/02/2007 8:05:12 AM PDT by Phsstpok (When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: snugs
Personally I do not think that Spector is doing the Repulicans any favours here.

That's why he's on the program.

314 posted on 09/02/2007 10:47:10 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson