Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facing the Past: New generations learn about shameful forced sterilizations
Winston-Salem Journal ^ | 8/30/07 | Patrick Wilson

Posted on 09/02/2007 11:08:32 AM PDT by wagglebee


>>   r e l a t e d   m a t e r i a l   <<
Elaine Riddick, who was sterilized under the states eugenics program, becomes emotional during the exhibit.  An exhibit in the Anderson Center at Winston-Salem State University shows that the states program was actively used across the state.
Elaine Riddick, who was sterilized under the state's eugenics program, becomes emotional during the exhibit. An exhibit in the Anderson Center at Winston-Salem State University shows that the state's program was actively used across the state.
(Journal Photo by Bruce Chapman)

Special Report

Against Their Will

For more information on the details of North Carolina's Sterilization program, see the JournalNow's special report, Against Their Will, a five-part series presented in April 2003 that includes multimedia presentations of victims, an interactive timelineand sample IQ tests used to classify the "feebleminded."

2007 Update

Journal graphic by Richard Boyd II
Click to enlarge


The looks on their faces were somber as they listened to recordings of the stories of those who were forcibly sterilized under North Carolina’s eugenics program.

About 300 people came to Winston-Salem State University yesterday for an opening reception and to see the state’s new exhibit explaining the program.

“Look at the ages, 13, 14,” said Johnetta Huntley, a counselor at Parkland High School. “They’re all young.

“Our children need to be exposed to this so they won’t let something of this nature happen again.”

The interactive exhibit opened in Raleigh in June and made its first stop on the road at WSSU earlier this month.

The state’s eugenics program lasted from 1929 until 1974.

A five-member board made decisions to sterilize young and poor women and men, many of them against their will. More than 7,600 people were sterilized.

People who viewed the exhibit said they were shocked that states endorsed and carried out such programs.

“This is a project that is really embarrassing for the whole United States of America, for something like this to have taken place,” said Bobbie Linville of Winston-Salem. “This is something that you would expect in Nazi Germany.”

The exhibit explains eugenics and how it was carried out, has stories from survivors and displays medical tools, including a caliper, curette and forceps.

Several students said they are just now learning about the program.

Brittany Jones is a sophomore at WSSU who attended the reception at the Anderson Center after an instructor recommended that students see the exhibit.

“It was definitely unfair. It didn’t give the people a chance to actually have a family of their own,” Jones said of the state’s eugenics program. “I didn’t really see anything wrong with the people that were sterilized.”

Some of the survivors came to the reception, which included a panel discussion. One of them, Elaine Riddick, watched as people listened to her story through a telephone receiver.

Riddick was 14 when she was sterilized at a hospital in Edenton in 1968.

“I think that it’s reaching a lot of people,” she said of the exhibit.

Martinique Lewis, a junior at N.C. A&T State University, said she was surprised to learn that her home state of California conducted many sterilizations under its own program. She said that the exhibit shows how unfairly those who were sterilized were treated.

“I just wish it was bigger and it was better publicized so more people can know,” she said.

State Rep. Larry Womble, D-Forsyth, who is pushing legislation to require the state to financially compensate the people who were sterilized, helped get the exhibit to WSSU as its first stop outside of Raleigh. State officials say they hope to set up other locations.

The exhibit will be on display on the second floor of the F.L. Atkins Building on campus through Jan. 31. The building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. There is no charge to view the exhibit.

■ Patrick Wilson can be reached at 727-7286 or at pwilson@wsjournal.com.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2manybastards; 600notenough; 7; eugenics; forcedsterilization; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Unfortunately, some self-proclaimed conservatives would like this to be brought back.
1 posted on 09/02/2007 11:08:35 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser; Mr. Silverback

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 09/02/2007 11:09:06 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 09/02/2007 11:09:30 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There are now more sophisticated methods to arrive at the same result. For example, sex ed in public schools.


4 posted on 09/02/2007 11:27:27 AM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
There are many adult men and women who project lust onto preteen girls. I’m sure the board was made up of jealous women and sex crazed men. Those who did this need and deserve all the love we reserve for child molesters. Laws need to be put on the books for these crimes. I would like to see these people be given life without parole and hard labor. Their assets should also be confiscated. Even that would not serve justice. It would only be a deterrent to those who are stupid and heartless enough to follow in the footsteps of those eugenicists. Only God can give eugenicists justice.
5 posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:12 AM PDT by perseid 67 (God is great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Unfortunately, some self-proclaimed conservatives would like this to be brought back."

Then name them, if they don't exist mainly in your head.

6 posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:26 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Authoritarianism. Then with an active, official eugenics program, and now with passive dysgenics (welfare/nanny-state). And in one of the few areas in which the government should be stronger (protecting the LIFE and LIBERTY of INDIVIDUALS from violence and coercion), its weakness makes it complicit in an unofficial eugenics program - one which has claimed tens of millions of innocent human lives.

For all our fears of some external barbaric enemy, history teaches us that the greatest atrocities wrt to human life occur at the hands of internal governments - eugenics, the Nazi holocaust, politically-motivated mass-starvation in Russia and China, the various communist purges and gulag systems, and the abortion industry, among countless others. Keep that in mind at the ballot box - an advanced people are almost universally destroyed from within.

7 posted on 09/02/2007 11:32:23 AM PDT by M203M4 (Vote conservatism in 2008, have some standards - a Marxist is a Marxist. Vote life, vote liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Read some of the threads dealing with eugenics.

There are actually people who claim they are conservative and support this sort of socialist tripe.

I hope they are just trolls.


8 posted on 09/02/2007 11:33:38 AM PDT by perseid 67 (God is great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

You should have no problem finding them yourselves on these threads:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1887900/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1886493/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1876379/posts


9 posted on 09/02/2007 11:34:19 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Unfortunately, some self-proclaimed conservatives would like this to be brought back.

Whereas Democrats are "pro conception" because revenue can be generated via the wholesale slaughter of children before they can escape the womb.

10 posted on 09/02/2007 11:35:27 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

In 1973 the liberals got Roe v. Wade and didn’t need sterilizations any longer.


11 posted on 09/02/2007 12:14:01 PM PDT by donna (Equal justice for U.S. citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Who were the people who supported Terri Schiavo’s right to live? I don’t remember seeing any liberals there except Jesse Jackson. If you cannot name conservatives who support forced sterilizations, then don’t make broad generalizations. I can name dozens of conservatives who openly support the right to life. Unfortunately, there are not many liberals I can name. Anyone care to help?


12 posted on 09/02/2007 12:22:54 PM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (Fred Thompson in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

I’m not going to get into naming them, you can see for yourself in these links:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1887900/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1886493/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1876379/posts


13 posted on 09/02/2007 12:26:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Unfortunately, some self-proclaimed conservatives would like this to be brought back.

>"Against Their Will"

The story of current, past, and future taxpayers forced to provide for unplanned/uncontrolled reproduction of those not able to provide for themselves let alone progeny!

14 posted on 09/02/2007 1:13:39 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Did you know that everyday mexican gays sneak into this country and unplug our brain dead ladies HJS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

So, do you believe that these sterilization programs should be brought back?


15 posted on 09/02/2007 1:14:52 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If the public has to pay for the delivery, and life time support, yes. The current system is a free for all taxpayer give away.

If you are a ward of the state (IE free medical and or welfare recipient) you should be treated as such.

Let em have 1. The sterelization should be reversible, so when and if the ward of the state can afford to reverse it, they should be able to provide for their own progeny.

Or we could just "donate" our entire GDP to the third world and become them.

16 posted on 09/02/2007 1:44:22 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Did you know that everyday mexican gays sneak into this country and unplug our brain dead ladies HJS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Ward of the State, you want foster children sterilized?


17 posted on 09/02/2007 1:50:54 PM PDT by perseid 67 (God is great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: perseid 67
I'm not heartless. Let them procreat once. Then both parents prevented from adding to the burden on society.

What was done in the previous situation was barbaric. What is happening now leads us to barbarism.

18 posted on 09/02/2007 2:03:10 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Did you know that everyday mexican gays sneak into this country and unplug our brain dead ladies HJS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

You are harsh and cruel towards the poor and the temporarily poor.


19 posted on 09/02/2007 2:06:58 PM PDT by perseid 67 (God is great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Anyone no matter how smart can become a burden. We are supposed to help each other through difficult times. I’m surprised you can’t see how such a nanny state program would be abused.


20 posted on 09/02/2007 2:12:00 PM PDT by perseid 67 (God is great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson