Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockstrader
Reread my post, I never said that Rudy was the only one, just that my gut tells me he could handle it. I also said that the other two would be great Presidents, they just happen to not be my #1 choice right now.

You will be happy to know that since my state doesn't vote until a few weeks after "Super Duper Tuesday", my choice may not count anyway. I also think that looking at the demographics of the country that Rudy has a very good chance of winning the electoral college. I have not yet been convinced that Fred can pick up any states that President Bush lost in 2004, and Ohio has been leaning more and more to the left. If he can't hold those States, or pick up additional ones, we are toast. I think we have a better chance with Rudy. We may even pick up New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. Wisconsin, and Minnesota are not out of reach either. What makes you think Fred could do that? (I truly don't know the answer, so I am not trying to be snarky)

85 posted on 09/03/2007 1:39:35 PM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: codercpc
What makes you think Fred could do that?

I don't know the answer to that either, but I DO know this. First, we do NOT need a LIBERAL bully to fight the WOT,,,and second, a conservative like Fred will unite and energize the base. A liberal like Rudy will do just the opposite.

86 posted on 09/03/2007 1:54:37 PM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative candidate who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal one who will DIVIDE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson