[mysterio]

If the prevailing wage is $1 an hour, I think most people would take a job for $2 an hour. If the prevailing wage was $3 an hour, most people would not.

They don't have a choice. It's either accept the slave wage, starve, or sneak into America to work illegally. They WILL eventually choose revolt, however, and it will be left wing.

More humane than starvation. Do you agree?

No. There is no excuse for using slave labor.

Who is in charge that agrees with me?

Bush, and Clinton before him.

If we send the illegals back and seal the border with there be a revolution in Mexico? Maybe. Would it be worse than it is now? Maybe. It might also get better.

Is Cuba "better?" Is Venezuela "better?"

Should we allow millions of illegals in to prevent a revolution, or at least a major change in their system? I don't think so.

No. We should pay a humane wage at our factories in Mexico like you, Bill Clinton, and the rest of the NAFTA proponents predicted would happen.

[Toddsterpatriot]

They don't have a choice. It's either accept the slave wage, starve, or sneak into America to work illegally.

That looks like 3 choices. Slaves don't get to make choices.

No. There is no excuse for using slave labor.

Slaves don't earn wages.

Bush, and Clinton before him.

Bush and Clinton wanted to close the border and send the illegals back? When was that?

Is Cuba "better?" Is Venezuela "better?"

We should allow illegals to invade because Cuba is bad? Maybe we'd install a puppet regime?

We should pay a humane wage at our factories in Mexico like you, Bill Clinton, and the rest of the NAFTA proponents predicted would happen.

Wages are lower than they were before NAFTA?