Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fight_truth_decay

I forgot to add that I am convinced the leak to Roll Call about Sen. Craig’s arrest came from a Republican. Democrats knew all about it but were planning to hold it until at least after the filing deadline in Idaho, and probably until 30 days before the election, just like they did with Mark Foley. Some wise Republican got wind of it and preempted the Dems. Now the GOP will keep that Senate seat and the whole thing will have died down well before the 2008 election.


8 posted on 09/04/2007 11:32:33 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dems_R_Losers
One thing that I always questioned, I heard nothing about...

Starting off, the police report had nothing in it in regard to playing footsie with the undercover guy. The media played that angle. Rush mentioned this yesterday, in fact. Became a Democratic talking point.

Now, did Craig have any suggestive eye contact with this undercover guy, invitation to act, before he went into the stall. Why of all times, in this location, at this time, did Craig feel he feel secure enough with who he is as a family man to follow through with this alleged sexual offer? Does this undercover guy spend his days just standing in this stall? Was Craig followed in? Something happened before the stall moment. I just want wanna know what led up to a seems like "sure sting".

Part of the story is missing, if I was attempting a screenplay on material like this.

15 posted on 09/05/2007 7:48:23 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson