What's Wrong with the GAO Report [IRAQ]

"One could go on cataloguing the failings of the GAO report, both in its mandate and in its execution, but the exercise would quickly become tedious. The GAO was given a fool's errand by a Congress determined to generate at least one report this September that it could reliably cite showing failure in Iraq. Well, Congress accomplished its goal. For those of us who are interested in what is really happening in Iraq, the reports of General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker will be far more useful."

The Demagogues cooked up a farcical GAO report so that they can have a propaganda weapon to wield against all signs of progress in Iraq.

The scope and execution of this "report" were carefully designed to guarantee a negative report, for the Demagogues are so invested in retreat and defeat that they cannot allow any serious discussion of progress and success. What useless, treasonous scumbags.

Exactly. This is no fault of the GAO but rather the fault of Congress, which prohibited the GAO from producing a report other than that which would cast failure on the War. And so to no one's surprise, it came out with the report the Democrats wanted.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

Congress deserves the most blame, of course, for trying to create a pre-fab "report" that would provide only an all-or-nothing checklist to try to make the situation look as bleak as possible. But I think that the GAO types were also too willing to give the Demagogues what they wanted rather than to make sure the report provided a more complete picture of what is really going on in Iraq:

[KAGAN]: "One of the most striking things about the GAO Report is its failure to take adequate notice of the Anbar Awakening and the general movement within the Sunni Arab community against Al Qaeda In Iraq and toward the Coalition. "Anbar" appears twice in the document, both times in a comment noting that violence has fallen in that province, but without reference to the turn of the Sunni population against the terrorists. That omission is unfathomable considering the significance of the movement among Sunnis over precisely the time in which the GAO was researching and producing this report. During the same period in which the report's authors note that they were in Iraq, I was also in Iraq, and received detailed briefings on the Sunni movement not only in Anbar, but also in Diyala, Baghdad, and Babil provinces. It is difficult to imagine that the GAO authors did not receive similar briefings, but even harder to understand why, if they did, they made no mention of the phenomenon. Of course, the Congressionally-mandated benchmarks take no account of the grassroots Sunni movement, and so made it difficult for the GAO to bring them into the picture."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.