Gay Activist Mike Rogers to Out "30" Republican's

Wayne Besen ^ | Tuesday, September 04, 2007 | Waybe Besen

[Jose Pen]

I am sure the RNC is on to this right....?

[xcamel]

“Bring it on, Butt Munch...”

[Augustinian monk]

Dont ask Dont tell

[E. Pluribus Unum]

So there are no closeted Democrats?

[Orange1998]

Out them all for all I care. I really don’t care.

[dinoparty]

Any chance HRC will be on the list?

[Jose Pen]

Republicans would notknow even if there
where! I think this list is to be used
every election so they will bring out
two a year...around election time.

[JamesA]

Lawyers standing by...press on rump ranger press on.

[stevio]

Our community should find a way to come up with at least $333,000 ($10,000 per potential hypocrite) to support Rogers' ongoing investigations.

I guess knowing math and being queer are two different things.

[xzins]

I sure hope it happens.

I believe in Gideon’s Army.

[Pyro7480]

Fartknocker!

[CharlesWayneCT]

Apparently 3.

[icwhatudo]

Every time I hear about one of these explosive “lists” of “politicians” it winds up being a bunch of aides no one has heard of, some state government people no one has ever heard of, or a relative of some think tank/talk radio/web person.

[Neoliberalnot]

Yeah, like a mentally deranged deviant has credibility with any sane person with a borrowed brain.

[mrs. a]

So he wants to wreck their careers by saying that they are.....like him?

The logic of the self-loathers escapes me...

[edcoil]

The DC madam’s list is considered classified and unavailable to the voter - wonder what will happen with this list.

[sheana]

According to The Washington Post, there are 33 names on Rogers’ list of Congressional charlatans - 30 of them Republicans

I have a really hard time believing there are 30 closet gay people in Congress, let alone 30 Republicans.
That would defy the national stats on gays per number of people.
Unless of course there is a reason that gays are drawn to public office.

[dinoparty]

This is a new age. It is impossible to sweep things under the rug anymore.

We can whine and complain about the intrusive and tasteless leftist attack dogs, or we can be more careful about who we support at election time. Perhaps the RNC should screen candidates with background checks before lending support!

[Pietro]

"Out them all for all I care. I really don’t care"

Ditto. The scum bag only hurts himself.

[theBuckwheat]

We are told by people who insist they are smarter and more caring than anyone on FR that homosexuality is just another viable alternative “lifestyle”, and it is perfectly natural and normal. Indeed, these same people bring studies to our attention whenever some species of animal is found to have homosexual behavior.

We are also told that there is no God and certainly no Judgment Day. If there were, God is so willing to forgive that none of this matters anyway, meaning that homosexuality cannot possibly be a moral issue. It is only narrow-minded Christians who insist it is, and they are just trying to impose their Taliban-like beliefs on everyone.

So, if there is no sin, nor moral issue, then why bother to “out” anyone? This is like a known jihadist threatening to reveal the names of other jihadists in order to punish them. It only makes sense if the gay activists know that the media will focus on the ones they out and not on the ones doing the outing. If the MSM were strictly neutral, this play wouldn’t move the ball foreword.