Skip to comments.
Asteroid Breakup May Have Doomed Dinosaurs
Centauri Dreams ^
| 9/5/07
Posted on 09/05/2007 11:55:02 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: LibWhacker
Yep.. breakups are hard on everyone.. LOL
To: LibWhacker
You know what makes liberals mad? The fact that Dinosaurs died and made room for man.
22
posted on
09/05/2007 12:40:49 PM PDT
by
dragonblustar
(Freedom of Speech is for everyone, not just liberals.)
To: presidio9
Once I figured out how to get the straight jacket off, the orderlies weren’t that hard to out-run.
______________
My problem is the opposite. They keep trying to take the thing off and I keep trying to put it back on. I’ve really been enjoying the Barnaby Jones reruns they show here at the, uh, farm.
23
posted on
09/05/2007 12:46:28 PM PDT
by
dmz
To: CharlesWayneCT
Stellar couple breaks up: pet dinosaurs hit hardest!!
To: Hoffer Rand
The odds of two asteroids in the vastness of space colliding within the gravitational pull of earth has to be monumentally hugh.
To: traderrob6
And I STILL love how these ‘asteroids’ only targeted dinosaurs! All other life on this planet escaped harm...
To: KingRonnie9
All other life on this planet escaped harm... What gives you this idea?
27
posted on
09/05/2007 1:16:46 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: KingRonnie9
these ‘asteroids’ only targeted dinosaurs! All other life on this planet escaped harm... Um, that's not exactly how things are supposed to have happened...
28
posted on
09/05/2007 1:47:48 PM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: LibWhacker
29
posted on
09/05/2007 1:49:11 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: Thud
To: SirLinksalot
What about the theory that they mostly died of a global deluge ? That religious belief was abandoned by early creationist geologists--who were trying to prove the global flood--about 1830.
31
posted on
09/05/2007 1:55:52 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
That religious belief was abandoned by early creationist geologists--who were trying to prove the global flood--about 1830.
Name names please.
To: SirLinksalot
That religious belief was abandoned by early creationist geologists--who were trying to prove the global flood--about 1830. Name names please.
Reverend Adam Sedgwick, Woodwardian Professor of Geology at Cambridge University, and President of the Geological Society of London.
An article describing the capitulation of the last major holdout for the global flood in geology (made during a speech on February 18, 1831) appears here.
33
posted on
09/05/2007 2:17:24 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
An article describing the capitulation of the last major holdout for the global flood in geology
All we can say is this ONE man capitulated. But to say he is the last major holdout ignores the fact that we have major groups still in existence today who have not capitulated and are in fact still trying to prove this theory.
To: SirLinksalot
To: SirLinksalot
Must’ve been raining iridium that day!
To: LibWhacker
Rusty: Do you have Asteroids?
Dale: No, but my dad does. He can't even sit on the toilet some days.
37
posted on
09/05/2007 2:36:36 PM PDT
by
steveo
(Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
To: CatoRenasci
I never read him so I can't say. Wasn't he writing about planets and not asteroids in particular?
I'm not saying planets can't collide (in fact they now think that's how the moon was created), but that was very early in the history of the solar system. I think mainstream scientists believe things have been pretty stable since those early days of the "heavy bombardment," at least when it comes to planets.
To: LibWhacker
39
posted on
09/05/2007 2:43:11 PM PDT
by
Jonah Hex
("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
To: Rummyfan
Nope, we're talking about evidence-based science.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
